Skip to content

Versafitcup CC TRIO Acetabular System 01.26.45.1148Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Versafitcup Metalback CC Trio No-hole Ø48 mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Versafitcup CC TRIO Acetabular System (32)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030807879), received between Nov 23, 2017 and May 8, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Issue” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Device Issue1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1

Patient problems

  • Implant Pain1
  • Joint Laxity1
  • No Code Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 8, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION SURGERY AFTER 2 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS DUE TO PAIN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP, HEAD, AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 25123176 ↗
  • InjuryDec 11, 2020Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    REVISION SURGERY 6 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY FOR CUP LOOSENING. ACETABULAR IMPLANTS REVISED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 10991278 ↗
  • InjuryNov 23, 2017Device Issue; Device Issue

    THE PE INLAY DID NOT WANT TO FIT WHEN INSERTING INTO THE CUP. THIS WAS ACHIEVED EVEN AFTER SEVERAL TESTS OF THE CUP AND THE INLAY FOR FOREIGN BODIES OR SIMILAR. A NEW INLAY WITH THE SAME SIZE WAS USED, WHICH WAS THEN PROPERLY FIT IN THE CUP. THE SURGERY COULD THEN BE SUCCESSFULLY TERMINATED WITHOUT PROBLEMS. THE CUP WAS NOT EXCHANGED.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 7057107 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page