Mectacer Biolox Delta Femoral Ball Head 01.29.201Recalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · Femoral Head Ø 28 Size S · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Mectacer Biolox Delta Femoral Ball Head (15)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Medacta Biolox Delta femoral ball head is the ceramic ball used in hip replacement surgery. The 31 reports mostly describe patients developing an infection at the implant site, sometimes within weeks of surgery and sometimes years later, along with pain, a loose cup, and a hip that dislocated;31 injuries and no deaths were reported. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 31
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 31
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 31 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030809125), received between Dec 27, 2017 and Dec 20, 2025 — classified as 31 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (12 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Appears to Trigger Rejection12
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem9
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available6
- Contamination1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
- Unstable1
Patient problems
- Unspecified Infection13
- Medical device site infection10
- Pain3
- Unequal Limb Length3
- Joint Laxity2
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
- Joint Dislocation1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 31 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryDec 20, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 1 MONTH FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND SWAPPED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 23858465 ↗InjuryNov 18, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ONE MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT RETURNED DUE TO AN EARLY-STAGE INFECTION OF AN UNKNOWN PATHOGEN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REPLACED THE STEM, LINER, AND HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 23583103 ↗InjuryNov 18, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT HAD PRIMARY LEFT HIP SURGERY. ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE CUP AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE CUP IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP, LINER, AND HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY (MDR (B)(4)). ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP, SCREWS, LINER, DM CONVERTER AND HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 23579953 ↗InjuryOct 29, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
NO DISLOCATION WAS OBSERVED DURING THE TRIAL STABILITY TEST (USED BROACH, TRIAL NECK AND TRIAL HEAD WITH TRIAL LINER IN THE FINAL SHELL). HOWEVER, AFTER INSERTING THE HEAD, DISLOCATION OCCURRED IN EXTENSION AND EXTERNAL ROTATION OF THE HIP. BONE IMPINGEMENT AND INTERFERENCE WITH OTHER SOFT TISSUES WERE CHECKED, BUT NO SUCH INFLUENCE WAS IDENTIFIED. THE HEAD SIZE WAS CHANGED FROM S TO M, AND THE SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. THE DELAY WAS 30 MINUTES, AND THE TOTAL SURGICAL TIME WAS 2 HOURS. DURING THE 30 MINUTES, THE POSITIONING WAS ADJUSTED, AND THE HEAD WAS REMOVED, THOUGH THE REMOVAL WAS SOMEWHAT DIFFICULT. AFTER THAT, A NEW TRIAL WAS PERFORMED, AND THE HEAD WAS REINSERTED.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 23412829 ↗InjuryJul 16, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 3 WEEKS FROM PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 22518025 ↗InjuryJul 8, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 3 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 22434262 ↗InjuryJul 7, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 10 YEARS 4 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 22411002 ↗InjuryMay 26, 2025Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
AT ABOUT 10 YEARS AND 3 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE DM CUP/LINER TO A COMPETITOR CUP/LINER AND REVISED THE MEDACTA HEAD WITH A MEDACTA HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 22084240 ↗InjuryJan 20, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE DAY AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT CAME REPORTED HIP INSTABILITY DUE TO A LEG LENGTH DISCREPANCY AND THE CAUSE IS REPORTED TO BE DUE TO IMPLANT SIZING.THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity; Unequal Limb Length
MAUDE report 21189776 ↗InjuryNov 22, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 1 MONTH AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 20757061 ↗InjuryNov 5, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 11 YEARS 6 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 20610086 ↗InjuryOct 11, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 7 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED HEAD AND LINER. SURGERY COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 20426611 ↗InjuryAug 8, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT ABOUT 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING A LEG LENGTH DISCREPANCY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER AND ADDED AN OPTION SLEEVE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unequal Limb Length
MAUDE report 19936769 ↗InjuryApr 9, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
REVISION SURGERY DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT 8 MONTHS POST PRIMARY THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 19070201 ↗InjuryMar 15, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT ABOUT 5 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT HAS BEEN REVISED ON THE RIGHT HIP SIDE BECAUSE OF LEG LENGTH DISCREPANCY. BALL HEAD AND DOUBLE MOBILITY LINER WERE REVISED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unequal Limb Length
MAUDE report 18911150 ↗InjuryJan 26, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 4 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN AND THE CAUSE WAS UNKNOWN. DURING THE REVISION SURGERY, A BONE TAMP WAS USED TO REMOVE THE HEAD AND THE DM LINER FROM THE TRUNION. AFTER HITTING ONCE WITH MALLET, THE CERAMIC HEAD BROKE INTO MULTIPLE PIECES WITHIN THE DM LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 18585791 ↗InjuryJan 25, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT ABOUT 4 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER AND HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 18578625 ↗InjuryJan 17, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 1 MONTH AND HALF AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE BIPOLAR AND FEMORAL HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 18525665 ↗InjuryDec 19, 2023Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 4 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE MEDACTA HEAD AND COMPETITOR LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 18356420 ↗InjuryDec 11, 2023Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
AT ABOUT 9 YEARS AND 3 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE OF THE INSTABILITY IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA HEAD AND LINER WITH A COMPETITOR'S COMPONENTS AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 18301130 ↗InjuryAug 23, 2022Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT 10 MOTHS FORM PRIMARY THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 15275475 ↗InjuryJul 20, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER AT ABOUT 20 DAYS FROM PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 15064922 ↗InjuryMay 8, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
2 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 11795343 ↗InjuryDec 3, 2020Unstable
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY 1 YEAR AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY WHICH WAS CAUSED BY A LEG LENGTH DISCREPANCY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE 28MM BIOLOX DELTA HEAD S WITH A 40MM BIOLOX OPTION HEAD AND ADDED A BIOLOX OPTION SLEEVE M. THE SURGEON ALSO REVISED THE CUP AND LINER WITH COMPETITOR PRODUCTS. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO PROBLEM WITH THE CUP, THE SURGEON REVISES IT IN ORDER TO MAKE IT FIT WITH THE SECOND HIP IMPLANTS.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 10940366 ↗InjurySep 7, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. 1 MONTH AFTER PRIMARY THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 10499304 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-310Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented551 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented481 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-320Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death314 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-720Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death189 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 400-03-362Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented187 reports
- Anthology 71365705Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented176 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-40-710Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented170 reports
- PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-32-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented169 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page