Mectacer Biolox Delta Femoral Ball Head 01.29.204Recalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · Femoral Head Ø 32 Size S · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Mectacer Biolox Delta Femoral Ball Head (15)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This is a Medacta Biolox Delta ceramic femoral head, the ball-shaped part of a hip replacement. The 61 reports mostly describe the head dislocating or slipping out of its socket liner after surgery, along with infection at the implant site, pain, and joint looseness, often leading to revision surgery; no deaths were reported and 61 injuries were. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 62
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 62
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 62 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030809156), received between Jul 25, 2017 and Sep 9, 2026 — classified as 62 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (27 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated27
- Device Appears to Trigger Rejection11
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem9
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available8
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size2
- Insufficient Device Problem Information2
- Difficult to Remove1
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- Joint Dislocation17
- Pain9
- Unspecified Infection9
- Implant Pain7
- Joint Laxity7
- Medical device site infection7
- Joint Disorder3
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available2
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 62 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 9, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated
The patient had pain due to joint luxation; the head came off the liner, and the cause is unknown. There was no indication of trauma or fall. At about 1 month and a half post-primary. The surgeon revised the two-hole Acetabular shell to an Mpact DM Acetabular shell D 50, revised the 32mm Biolox Head S to a 28mm Biolox head L, and revised the Flat PE HC liner D 32/D to a Double Mobility HC Liner D 28/DME. The surgery was completed successfully.
Patient problems: Implant Pain; Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 50692309 ↗InjuryJun 17, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT HAD PRIMARY RIGHT HIP SURGERY WITH MEDACTA PRODUCTS. ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT, I&D, AND REVISED THE 32 MM BIOLOX S HEAD AND D 32/D LINER TO A SAME SIZE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY [MDR (B)(4)]. PRESENTLY, ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO CONTINUED SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE CUP, LINER, HEAD, AND STEM AND REPLACED THEM WITH ANTIBIOTIC SPACERS TO TREAT THE INFECTION. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 25528760 ↗InjuryMay 26, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 9 YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON REVISED THE 32MM BIOLOX HEAD S TO A 28MM BIOLOX OPTION HEAD WITH SLEEVE SIZE M. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 25275468 ↗InjuryMay 8, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated
REVISION SURGERY DUE TO IMPLANT DISLOCATION AFTER ABOUT 2 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY SURGERY. DURING THE SURGERY THE HEAD WAS CHANGED FROM SIZE S TO SIZE M.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 25123205 ↗InjuryApr 30, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 2 WEEKS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT, I&D, AND REVISED THE 32MM BIOLOX S HEAD AND D 32/D LINER TO A SAME SIZE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 25039923 ↗InjuryApr 23, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated
THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO A DISLOCATION OF THE HEAD FROM THE LINERAFTER ABOUT 20 DAYS FROM THE PRIMARY. THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF A FALL THAT CONTRIBUTED TO THE DISLOCATION. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA CUP AND LINER TO A COMPETITOR CUP AND LINER AND REVISED THE HEAD TO AN OPTION HEAD WITH SLEEVE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 24964778 ↗InjuryFeb 18, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 9 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND MRSA AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REMOVED ALL PRIMARY IMPLANTS FOR ANTIBIOTIC SPACERS. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 24376301 ↗InjuryJan 23, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated
AT ABOUT 1 MONTH FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO PAIN AS THE RESULT OF A DISLOCATION OF THE HEAD AND LINER AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA CUP AND LINER TO A COMPETITOR CUP AND LINER, AND REVISED THE MEDACTA D 32MM BIOLOX HEAD S WITH A MEDACTA COCR 12/14 D 28MM XXL HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 24162755 ↗InjuryJan 9, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated
AT 3 WEEKS FROM PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A DISLOCATION OF THE HEAD FROM THE LINER AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE REP IS UNSURE IF TRAUMA OCCURRED.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 24020875 ↗InjuryNov 18, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 1 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 23583099 ↗InjuryNov 10, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
AT ABOUT 20 DAYS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A DISLOCATION OF THE HEAD FROM THE LINER, AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 23510651 ↗InjuryNov 4, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AFTER 2 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 23462128 ↗InjurySep 10, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN AND INSTABILITY DUE TO A LEG LENGTH DISCREPANCY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD (32 S TO 32 0) TO GIVE THE PATIENT MORE STABILITY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unequal Limb Length
MAUDE report 23013596 ↗InjuryAug 27, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AFTER 2 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION, AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REMOVED ALL COMPONENTS AND IMPLANTED AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER. THE SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 22903493 ↗InjuryJul 3, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT ABOUT 4 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A DISLOCATION OF THE HEAD FROM THE LINER AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 22395930 ↗InjuryJul 2, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AFTER 1 MONTH FROM THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 22384185 ↗InjuryMay 21, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
AT ABOUT 1 MONTH AND HALF AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A DISLOCATION OF THE HEAD FROM THE LINER AND THE CAUSE OF THE DISLOCATION IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE LINER, HEAD, SCREW AND CUP. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 22060081 ↗InjuryMay 5, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT ABOUT 8 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN AND INSTABILITY DUE TO A LEG LENGTH DISCREPANCY AND THE CAUSE IS KNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity; Pain; Unequal Limb Length
MAUDE report 21960295 ↗InjuryDec 30, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT ABOUT 8 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LEG LENGTH DISCREPANCY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 21033512 ↗InjuryOct 25, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
AT ABOUT 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A JOINT LUXATION AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD, CUP AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 20539547 ↗InjuryJul 12, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT 8 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, REVISION SURGERY DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF SCAR TISSUE SEROMA AND SUSPICION OF INFECTION. MOBILE COMPONENTS, INLAY AND HEAD SUCCESSFULLY REVISED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 19731016 ↗InjuryMay 24, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 9 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 19390100 ↗InjuryApr 23, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
WHILE IN POST-OP RECOVERY AT THE HOSPITAL, THE PATIENT DISLOCATED THE HIP (THE HEAD DISLOCATED FROM THE LINER). THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 19163665 ↗InjuryMar 27, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
REVISION DUE TO A DISLOCATION OF THE HEAD FROM THE LINER AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT 1 MONTH POST PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 18984913 ↗InjuryMar 22, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
AT ABOUT 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A DISLOCATION OF THE HEAD FROM THE LINER AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP AND LINER WITH COMPEITOR CUP AND LINER AND REVISED THE MEDACTA HEAD WITH A MEDACTA HEAD (Ø 32 SIZE S TO Ø22.2 MM SIZE M). THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. ANTERIOR APPROACH USED DURING THE PRIMARY SURGERY.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 18959162 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-310Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented551 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented481 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-320Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death314 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-720Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death189 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 400-03-362Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented187 reports
- Anthology 71365705Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented176 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-40-710Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented170 reports
- PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-32-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented169 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page