Skip to content

Mectacer Biolox Delta Femoral Ball Head 01.29.212Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Femoral Head Ø 40 Size S · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Mectacer Biolox Delta Femoral Ball Head (15)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
18
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
18
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 18 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030809231), received between Apr 9, 2019 and Jun 30, 2026 — classified as 18 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (6 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 2 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection6
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated6
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available3
  • Fracture1
  • Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection6
  • Joint Dislocation4
  • Medical device site infection4
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available2
  • Pain2
  • Joint Laxity1

Recent adverse event reports

The 18 most recent of 18 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 30, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    REVISION SURGERY DUE TO JOINT LUXATION AFTER ABOUT 8 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY SURGERY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE 40MM BIOLOX DELTA HEAD S TO A 28MM BIOLOX DELTA HEAD M AND REVISED THE FLAT PE HC LINER D 40/F TO A CONSTRAINED 10° PE LINER D 28/F. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 25663306 ↗
  • InjuryMay 27, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    REVISION SURGERY DUE TO JOINT LUXATION AFTER 8 DAYS FROM PRIMARY. THE CERAMIC HEAD DISLOCATED FROM THE LINER. THE SURGEON REVISED THE 40MM BIOLOX S HEAD WITH A SAME SIZE HEAD, AND REVISED THE FLAT PE HC D 40/F LINER TO A SAME SIZE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 25297695 ↗
  • InjuryMay 12, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT ABOUT 2 YEARS 9 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING ANTERIOR INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THERE WERE NO INDICATIONS OF TRAUMA. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER TO A DOUBLE MOBILITY SYSTEM WITH DM CONVERTER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 25148961 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 26, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING PAIN WITH SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 2 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT, THEN REVISED THE LINER AND HEAD TO IMPLANTS OF THE SAME SIZE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 24454903 ↗
  • InjuryNov 10, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER AND HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 23510675 ↗
  • InjuryJul 1, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 6 YEARS AND 3 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 22371287 ↗
  • InjuryMar 7, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    AFTER THE PRIMARY HIP SURGERY, THE PATIENT DISLOCATED ANTERIOR AND SUPERIOR IN THE POST OP RECOVERY AREA. ON THE SAME DAY, THE PATIENT WAS BROUGHT BACK AND THE HEAD AND LINER WERE REVISED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 21548761 ↗
  • InjuryOct 31, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE PATIENT HAD A PRIMARY HIP SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2024. ON (B)(6) 2024, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. ON (B)(6) 2024, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. ON (B)(6) 2024 THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REMOVED ALL IMPLANTS AND IMPLANTED AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. ON (B)(6) 2024, ANTIBIOTIC SPACER WAS REMOVED AND FINAL IMPLANTS WERE IMPLANTED. ON (B)(6) 2024, REVISION DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 20577539 ↗
  • InjuryAug 28, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE PATIENT HAS BEEN REVISED BECAUSE OF A JOINT LUXATION OCCURRED IN POST-OP RECOVERY, AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED SUCCESSFULLY THE HEAD, STEM AND LINER.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 20088915 ↗
  • InjuryMay 14, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 19309998 ↗
  • InjuryApr 2, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 19018523 ↗
  • InjuryJun 1, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    AFTER THE PRIMARY HIP SURGERY, IN POST-OP RECOVERY, THE PATIENT SUFFERED A JOINT LUXATION. THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP, LINER, AND HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 17036591 ↗
  • InjuryOct 5, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING THIGH PAIN AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 5 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA HEAD AND COMPETITOR LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 15542030 ↗
  • InjuryMay 6, 2022Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD ABOUT 1 MONTH AND 1 WEEK AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 14300828 ↗
  • InjurySep 15, 2021Fracture; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE PATIENT HAD A PRIMARY HIP SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021. ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE THAT WAS CAUSED FROM FALLING. THE SURGEON CABLED THE FRACTURE AND REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. PRESENTLY, ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LEG LENGTH DISCREPANCY AND THE CAUSE OF THE LEG LENGTH DISCREPANCY IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD WITH A COMPETITOR HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 12473173 ↗
  • InjurySep 14, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. 10 DAYS AFTER PRIMARY THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 12467900 ↗
  • InjuryAug 26, 2020Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    DURING POST-OP RECOVERY, THE PATIENT'S LINER DISLOCATED FROM THE HEAD. THE DAY AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 10452932 ↗
  • InjuryApr 9, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION SURGERY ABOUT 1 MONTH AFTER PRIMARY FOR HIP INFECTION. THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE BALL HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8495628 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page