Mectacer Biolox Delta Femoral Ball Head 01.29.214Recalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · Femoral Head Ø 40 Size L · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Mectacer Biolox Delta Femoral Ball Head (15)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 10
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 10
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030809255), received between Jun 16, 2020 and Nov 18, 2025 — classified as 10 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Appears to Trigger Rejection5
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available2
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
- Loose or Intermittent Connection1
- Unstable1
Patient problems
- Medical device site infection5
- Joint Dislocation2
- Insufficient Information1
- Joint Laxity1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 18, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 1 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND HEAD AND LINER SWAP. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 23583098 ↗InjuryNov 10, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT 2 WEEKS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA HEAD WITH A MEDACTA HEAD AND REVISED THE COMPETITOR LINER WITH A COMPETITOR LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 23510656 ↗InjuryAug 20, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 10 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO PAIN THAT WAS DETERMINED BY THE SURGEON TO BE A RESULT OF INFECTION WITH AN UNKNOWN CAUSE. THE SURGEON REVISED THE PROXIMAL BODY, FEMORAL HEAD AND LINER IN ADDITION TO PERFORMING A WASHOUT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 22849203 ↗InjuryApr 24, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 3 YEARS AND 3 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD AND COMPETITOR HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 21899448 ↗InjuryFeb 12, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 5 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REMOVED ALL MEDACTA HARDWARE AND IMPLANTED AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 21364687 ↗InjuryApr 2, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
THE PATIENT HAD A PRIMARY HIP SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2023. ON (B)(6) 2023, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A DISLOCATION OF THE HEAD FROM THE LINER AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. PRESENTLY, ON (B)(6) 2024, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A DISLOCATION OF THE HEAD FROM THE LINER. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA CUP AND LINER WITH A COMPETITOR CUP AND LINER AND REVISED THE MEDACTA HEAD WITH A MEDACTA HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 19018524 ↗InjuryJun 14, 2023Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
AT ABOUT 3 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY DUE TO A LEG LENGTH DISCREPANCY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 17123884 ↗InjuryOct 4, 2021Loose or Intermittent Connection; Unstable
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY DUE TO LAXITY. THE CAUSE OF LAXITY IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 7 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON REVISED THE 40MM BIOLOX DELTA HEAD L TO A 40MM BIOLOX DELTA HEAD XL. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 12568614 ↗InjuryMar 24, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A DISLOCATION OF THE HEAD FROM THE LINER. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD 23 DAYS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE LINER WAS LEFT IN SITU.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 11562515 ↗InjuryJun 16, 2020Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT CAME IN 6 DAYS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE MEDACTA HEAD WITH A MEDACTA HEAD AND ANOTHER COMPANY'S LINER WITH A COMPETITOR'S LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 10157886 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-310Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented551 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented481 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-320Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death314 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-720Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death189 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 400-03-362Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented187 reports
- Anthology 71365705Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented176 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-40-710Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented170 reports
- PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-32-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented169 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page