Mpact Acetabular System 01.32.146MHRecalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · Acetabular shell Ø46 Multi-hole · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Mpact Acetabular System (68)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030810718), received between Jun 28, 2019 and Sep 15, 2021 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loose or Intermittent Connection” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Loose or Intermittent Connection1
- Material Fragmentation1
Patient problems
- Insufficient Information1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 15, 2021Loose or Intermittent Connection
THE PRIMARY SURGERY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2020. THE PATIENT CAME TO THE HOSPITAL (B)(6) 2021 AND THE SURGEON NOTICED LOOSENING OF CUP AND STEM. THE REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 11 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE REASON WHICH OCCURRED GAP AND/OR LOOSENING AT ACETABULAR SIDE IS NOT CLEAR.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 12475428 ↗MalfunctionJun 28, 2019Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
THE SURGEON DISCOVERED DEBRIS OF THE COATING IN THE INNER BLISTER BEFORE IMPLANTING THE MPACT CUP. IT WAS DOUBTFUL IF THEY WERE GENERATED FROM TITANIUM COATING, SO IN ORDER TO AVOID ANY RISK, A BACK UP MPACT CUP 48MM WAS USED FOR THE ALTERNATIVE. NO CRITICAL DELAY. NO PATIENT RELATED THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8743235 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-310Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented551 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented481 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-320Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death314 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-720Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death189 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 400-03-362Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented187 reports
- Anthology 71365705Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented176 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-40-710Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented170 reports
- PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-32-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented169 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page