Skip to content

Mpact Acetabular System 01.32.150MHRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Acetabular shell Ø50 Multi-hole · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Mpact Acetabular System (68)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030810770), received between Jul 21, 2017 and Nov 27, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Failure to Osseointegrate1
  • Misassembled1
  • Osseointegration Problem1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration2
  • No Information1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 27, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    AT ABOUT 11 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE CUP AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP, HEAD, SLEEVE AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 20797662 ↗
  • InjuryAug 23, 2022Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 4 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT CAME IN FOR A POST-OP APPOINTMENT AND IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE CUP HAS MOBILIZED. THE CAUSE OF THIS IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED SUCCESSFULLY THE CUP, HEAD, LINER AND SCREWS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 15273675 ↗
  • InjuryNov 14, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ABOUT 10 DAYS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT FOR AN INFECTION CASE. CUP, LINER AND BALL HEAD WERE SWAPPED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8069019 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 21, 2017Misassembled; Misassembled

    DURING SURGERY THE CUP IMPACTOR WOULD NOT DISENGAGE FROM THE CUP. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE IMPACTOR AND CUP. AFTER 10 MINUTES, THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO DISENGAGE THE CUP FROM THE IMPACTOR. THE SURGEON MANUALLY IMPACTED THE CUP WITH A BALL IMPACTOR. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. INSTRUMENTATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 6731724 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page