Skip to content

Mpact Acetabular System 01.32.152SHRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Acetabular shell Ø52 No-hole · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Mpact Acetabular System (68)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030810817), received between Dec 12, 2018 and May 9, 2023 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Failure to Osseointegrate1
  • Fracture1
  • Malposition of Device1

Patient problems

  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Pain1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 9, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    REVISION SURGERY AT ABOUT 2 MONTHS POST PRIMARY FOLLOWING SHELL MOBILIZATION. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 16893409 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 12, 2021Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device

    THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO CUP IMPINGEMENT. THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP AND LINER TO A COMPETITOR CUP AND LINER 4 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE REASON THE PATIENT HAD A CUP IMPINGEMENT IS BECAUSE DURING THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE CUP WAS MISPLACED AND UNDERSIZED/OVER-REAMED IN COMBINATION WITH THE PATIENT HAVING A SPINAL ISSUE THAT MAKES THE ROM CHALLENGING TO ACCESS UNDER ANESTHESIA.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain

    MAUDE report 11321462 ↗
  • InjuryMay 2, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED 13 DAYS AFTER THE PREVIOUS REVISION (PERFORMED WASHOUT AND HEAD REVISION ALSO DUE TO AN INFECTION, MDR 2019-00290) DUE TO AN INFECTION (THE PATHOGEN HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS STAPHYLOCOCCUS). THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE STEM, HEAD, LINER, AND CUP. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE PRIMARY CASE WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8573535 ↗
  • InjuryDec 12, 2018Fracture

    FROM THE EARLY POST-OP X-RAYS, THE SURGEON DETECTED AN ACETABULUM FRACTURE. THE PATIENT WILL BE NON-WEIGHT BEARING FOR 6 WEEKS. THE SURGEON PLANS TO FOLLOW UP ON THE FRACTURE IN 6 WEEKS TO DETERMINE IF IT HAS HEALED PROPERLY. THE SURGEON DOES NOT FEEL THAT A REVISION WILL BE NECESSARY.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 8155016 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page