Skip to content

Mpact Acetabular System 01.32.154SHRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Acetabular shell Ø54 No-hole · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Mpact Acetabular System (68)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030810848), received between Jun 22, 2021 and Mar 21, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Failure to Osseointegrate1
  • Malposition of Device1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Loss of Range of Motion1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 21, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    AT ABOUT ONE YEAR AND ONE MONTH FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE CUP AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE CUP IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP AND LINER AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 18952031 ↗
  • InjuryDec 13, 2023Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device

    THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING LACK OF RANGE OF MOTION. AT ABOUT 4 YEARS AND 5 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE SURGEON DECIDED THAT THE PATIENT NEEDED MORE CUP INCLINATION AND RANGE OF MOTION, SO HE REVISED THE CUP, HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion

    MAUDE report 18317938 ↗
  • InjuryJun 22, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    9 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO ILIOPSOAS TENDON AND CUP IMPINGEMENT AND THE CAUSE OF THE ILIOPSOAS IMPINGEMENT IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP, HEAD, AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 12038731 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page