Mpact Acetabular System 01.32.158MHRecalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · Acetabular shell Ø58 Multi-hole · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030810909), received between Jul 4, 2018 and Jul 18, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loose or Intermittent Connection” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available3
- Loose or Intermittent Connection2
- Biofilm coating in Device1
- Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
- Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1
- Migration or Expulsion of Device1
Patient problems
- Inadequate Osseointegration3
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- Medical device site infection1
- Septic loosening1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 18, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
IN (B)(6) 2025 THE PATIENT UNDERWENT THA. ON THE (B)(6), THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY DUE TO AN ACETABULAR FRACTURE CAUSED BY TRAUMA. NO MDR SENT AS IT WAS A TRAUMATIC EVENT. CURRENTLY, ON THE (B)(6), THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION DUE TO SUSPECTED INFECTION. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE HEAD AND LINER AND PERFORMED A WASHOUT. ALSO, THE SURGEON TESTED THE CUP STABILITY AND FOUND IT MOBILIZED. THE SURGEON THEN PROCEEDED WITH THE REVISION OF THE CUP TOO WITH A 62 MPACT TWO-HOLES CUP. SURGERY COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection; Septic loosening
MAUDE report 22541818 ↗InjuryJul 21, 2021Migration or Expulsion of Device; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
14 DAYS AFTER THE PRIMARY THE PATIENT CAME IN FOR A POST-OP APPOINTMENT AND ON THE LEFT SIDE IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE CUP HAD MIGRATED AND THE CAUSE OF THE CUP MIGRATION IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP AND LINER WITH COMPETITOR COMPONENTS ADDING AN AUGMENT AND REVISED THE MEDACTA HEAD WITH A MEDACTA HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 12201464 ↗InjuryApr 29, 2021Loose or Intermittent Connection; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED FOLLOWING CUP LOOSENING 1 YEAR AND 4 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 11743642 ↗InjuryNov 11, 2020Loose or Intermittent Connection; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE CUP. THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE CUP IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP, HEAD, AND LINER 11 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 10821842 ↗MalfunctionJan 25, 2019Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material
DURING THE PRIMARY HIP SURGERY AND UPON OPENING THE CUP PACKAGING, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THERE WAS FOREIGN DEBRIS INSIDE THE PACKAGING. THERE WAS A 10 MINUTE DELAY IN THE CASE WHILE THE AGENT CHECKED HIS INVENTORY TO SEE IF THERE WAS ANOTHER CUP AVAILABLE. NO OTHER CUP WAS AVAILABLE SO THE SURGEON CLEANED THE DEBRIS OFF OF THE CUP AND IMPLANTED IT INTO THE PATIENT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8277371 ↗MalfunctionJul 4, 2018Biofilm coating in Device
THE NURSE FOUND SOME COATING PIECES IN THE CUP INNER PACKAGING. THE SURGEON USED A BACK-UP IMPLANT TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7662369 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-310Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented551 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented481 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-320Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death314 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-720Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death189 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 400-03-362Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented187 reports
- Anthology 71365705Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented176 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-40-710Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented170 reports
- PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-32-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented169 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page