Skip to content

Mpact Acetabular System 01.32.160SHRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Acetabular shell Ø60 No-hole · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Mpact Acetabular System (68)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030810961), received between Nov 9, 2021 and Jun 9, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
  • Fracture1

Patient problems

  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Medical device site infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 9, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025 DUE TO INFECTION. A PUNCTURE/ASPIRATION WAS SUBSEQUENTLY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2026.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 25442531 ↗
  • InjuryNov 9, 2021Fracture

    AT 3 WEEKS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN AND STIFFNESS. IT WAS DETERMINED FROM X-RAYS THAT THE CUP HAD FRACTURED THROUGH THE ANTERIOR/MEDIAL WALL OF THE PELVIS AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP, LINER AND HEAD SUCCESSFULLY. THE PATIENT'S BONE WAS SOFT.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 12777448 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page