Mpact Acetabular System 01.32.162DHRecalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · Acetabular shell Ø62 Two-holes · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Mpact Acetabular System (68)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030810978), received between Jul 30, 2018 and Oct 7, 2020 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Loose or Intermittent Connection1
- Malposition of Device1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- Insufficient Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryOct 7, 2020Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
THE PATIENT HIP HAS DISLOCATED (HEAD FROM LINER) TWICE SINCE THE PRIMARY SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2020, BOTH TIMES WHILST THE SURGEON WAS ON HOLIDAY. THE PATIENT NEEDED AN URGENT REVISION ONCE HE CONSULTED HIM ON HIS RETURN. THE STEM WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A COMPETITOR STEM. THE CUP WAS SALVAGED. THE CUP INTRODUCER WAS ENGAGED IN THE CUP AND THE ANTEVERSION MANUALLY DECREASED. NEW 20-DEGREE LINER IMPLANTED. PATIENT APPEARED MORE STABLE. DURING PRIMARY: VALGUS STEM PLACEMENT, ANTE VERSION ON BOTH STEM AND CUP AND INCORRECT CHOICE OF OFFSET STEM AND HEAD, CONTRIBUTED TO AN INADEQUATE HIP OFFSET AND SUCCESSIVE DISLOCATION.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 10640899 ↗MalfunctionJan 2, 2019Loose or Intermittent Connection
DURING THE PRIMARY HIP SURGERY, THE 62MM CUP WOULD NOT SEAT INTO THE ACETABULUM. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE 62MM CUP AND IMPLANTED A 64MM CUP WITH NO ISSUES. THIS CAUSED A 5 MINUTE DELAY IN THE CASE AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE AGENT STATED THE ISSUE WAS DISCOVERED DURING THE IMPACTION PHASE AND STATED THAT THE CUP WAS LOOSE INSIDE OF THE ACETABULUM AND WOULD NOT FIXATE. THE SURGEON THEN ELECTED TO MOVE UP TO THE LARGER SIZE CUP.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8207996 ↗MalfunctionJul 30, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated
DURING A TOTAL HIP WHEN THE SURGEON WAS IMPLANTING THE CUP, THE INSERTER DISENGAGED FROM THE CUP. THE SURGEON USED A SECONDARY CUP AND A DIFFERENT INSERTER TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY. THERE WAS A TEN MINUTE DELAY IN THE CASE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7731843 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices
- PINNACLE 1217-25-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED735 reports
- NA 1365-52-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED683 reports
- APEX 1246-03-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED3 deaths613 reports
- PINNACLE 1217-20-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED2 deaths590 reports
- PINNACLE 1217-30-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED1 death484 reports
- NA 1365-53-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED404 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED388 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-32-050Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED386 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page