Skip to content

GMK Revision Total Knee System 02.07.0212SCFRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Tibial insert SC fixed 12mm, size 2 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of GMK Revision Total Knee System (71)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030816598), received between Sep 13, 2017 and Jul 9, 2026 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection2
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Microbial Contamination of Device1

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection3
  • Medical device site infection2
  • Joint Laxity1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 9, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    REVISION SURGERY AFTER3 YEARS FROM THE PRIMARY DUE TO INFECTION. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 25763462 ↗
  • InjuryDec 9, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 10 DAYS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 23758552 ↗
  • InjuryMar 17, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT HAD KNEE INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT 9 MONTHS POST MEDACTA PRIMARY, THE SURGEON REVISED ALL THE COMPONENTS IMPLANTING A GMK HINGE SYSTEM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 21618336 ↗
  • InjuryDec 13, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 3 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT KNEE INSERT AND FEMUR FOR AN INFECTION (RECIDIVIST INFECTION). THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. FEMUR IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2018.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 9466929 ↗
  • InjurySep 12, 2018Microbial Contamination of Device

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED DUE TO INFECTION, 2 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY. THIS IS THE SECOND REVISION FOR THIS PATIENT DUE TO INFECTION. THE SURGEON WASHED OUT THE KNEE AND SWAPPED THE POLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 7868588 ↗
  • InjurySep 13, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION. THE PATIENT WAS (B)(6) FOR (B)(6) . THE SURGEON PERFORMED AN I&D AND SWAPPED THE POLY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. X-RAYS AND EXPLANTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 6860914 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page