GMK Revision Total Knee System 02.07.0312SCFRecalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · Tibial insert SC fixed 12mm, size 3 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of GMK Revision Total Knee System (71)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 12
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 12
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030817175), received between Jul 13, 2017 and Oct 16, 2025 — classified as 12 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Appears to Trigger Rejection5
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available4
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Material Too Rigid or Stiff1
Patient problems
- Unspecified Infection7
- Joint Disorder2
- Loss of Range of Motion2
- Medical device site infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryOct 16, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
THE PATIENT HAD PRIMARY LEFT KNEE SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025. ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION, AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT, REMOVED ALL IMPLANTS, AND IMPLANTED AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. (MDR: (B)(4). ON (B)(6) 2025. PERMANENT IMPLANTS WERE PLACED (GMK-REVISION). ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND SWAPPED THE POLY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 23310523 ↗InjuryJun 20, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 5 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 19573512 ↗InjuryApr 11, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT ABOUT 6 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PREVIOUS REVISION SURGERY (WHEN MEDACTA GMK REVISION COMPONENTS HAVE BEEN IMPLANTED), THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING STIFFNESS IN THE KNEE AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED ALL COMPONENTS TO HINGE COMPONENTS AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. PATIENT HAD COMPETITOR COMPONENTS PRIOR TO MEDACTA REVISION COMPONENTS.
Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion
MAUDE report 19085909 ↗InjuryJul 28, 2023Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 2 YEARS 9 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 17412885 ↗InjuryJun 23, 2023Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 4 YEARS 8 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND POLY SWAP AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE PRIMARY WAS FROM A COMPETITOR AND THE SURGEON REVISED THE COMPETITOR TO MEDACTA REVISION COMPONENTS.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 17190244 ↗InjuryDec 29, 2022Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT 9 MONTHS POST PRIMARY THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE POLY AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 16068470 ↗InjuryApr 1, 2022Material Too Rigid or Stiff
THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH COMPETITOR KNEE COMPONENTS. ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT HAD THE COMPETITOR COMPONENTS REMOVED DUE TO AN INFECTION AND THE SURGEON IMPLANTED AN INSERT AND FEMORAL COMPONENT AS A SPACER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. ON (B)(6) 2022 THE PATIENT HAD THE SPACER REMOVED AND THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT WITH ALL NEW MEDACTA HARDWARE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. PRESENTLY, ON (B)(6) 2022 THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING TIGHTNESS IN THE KNEE AND THE CAUSE OF THE TIGHTNESS IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE LINER (20 MM TO 10 MM) AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion
MAUDE report 13975654 ↗InjurySep 27, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE POLY AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 12532040 ↗InjuryJul 7, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE POLY AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 12126586 ↗InjuryFeb 18, 2020Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
TWO YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO LACK OF RANGE OF MOTION. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A MENISCECTOMY AND REVISED THE MEDACTA INSERT SEMICONSTRAINED 12MM S3 WITH A MEDACTA INSERT SEMICONSTRAINED 10MM S3 ALMOST 2 YEARS AFTER PREVIOUS SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 9719558 ↗InjuryOct 2, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
ON THE 3 SEPTEMBER 2019 WE WERE INFORMED OF A REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ON THE (B)(6) 2019, 7 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO STIFFNESS OF THE KNEE. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A LINER SWAP (SIZE 12 MM TO 10 MM) SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 9144400 ↗InjuryJul 13, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION. THE INFECTION WAS SUPERFICIAL. THE SURGEON SWAPPED THE POLY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. X-RAYS AND EXPLANTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 6710491 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices
- ATTUNE 1506-00-005Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER589 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-004Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER580 reports
- JOURNEY 74012812Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER502 reports
- JOURNEY 74011856Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER438 reports
- PERSONA™ 42-5099-094-00Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER406 reports
- JOURNEY 74011857Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER388 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-007Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER288 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-003Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER271 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page