Skip to content

GMK Revision Total Knee System 02.07.0517SCFRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Tibial insert SC fixed 17mm, size 5 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of GMK Revision Total Knee System (71)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
8
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030818578), received between Aug 5, 2020 and Aug 3, 2026 — classified as 8 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available3
  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection3
  • Loss of Range of Motion2
  • Medical device site infection2
  • Joint Laxity1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 3, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    Revision surgery due to knee instability after about 3 years and 7 months from primary. The surgeon revised the femur with a femur of the same size with distal and posterior augments and upsized the poly for more stability.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 50114122 ↗
  • InjuryApr 1, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT HAD A PRIMARY SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2023. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN WAS UNKNOWN. ON (B)(6) 2023, THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE POLY. PRESENTLY, ON (B)(6) 2025, THE SURGEON REVISED THE 17MM POLY WITH A 14MM LINER AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion

    MAUDE report 21739733 ↗
  • InjuryMar 1, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT 3 WEEKS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 18815070 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 27, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE PATIENT HAD A COMPETITOR PRIMARY KNEE SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018. ON (B)(6) 2023, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN WAS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED SUCCESSFULLY THE LINER. PRESENTLY, ON (B)(6) 2024, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED SUCCESSFULLY THE LINER.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 18788786 ↗
  • InjuryApr 12, 2023Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN WAS UNKNOWN. AT 2 MONTHS POST PRIMARY THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND POLY SWAP AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 16722679 ↗
  • InjuryAug 30, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    ON (B)(6) 2020, THE PATIENT HAD THE COMPETITOR COMPONENTS REVISED TO MEDACTA COMPONENTS FOR REASONS UNKNOWN. PRESENTLY, ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING DISCOMFORT DUE TO A FLEXION CONTRACTURE AND THE CAUSE OF THE FLEXION CONTRACTURE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE 17MM INSERT WITH A 14MM ONE, ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion

    MAUDE report 12382908 ↗
  • InjurySep 30, 2020Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE PATIENT CAME IN, 1 MONTH AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY, DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND POLY-SWAP AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 10604871 ↗
  • InjuryAug 5, 2020Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE PATIENT CAME IN 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND A POLY-SWAP AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 10366327 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page