GMK Revision Total Knee System 02.07.0683LRecalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · Revision Fixed tibial tray cemented Left, size 3 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of GMK Revision Total Knee System (71)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030819360), received between Aug 29, 2019 and Jul 25, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
Patient problems
- Insufficient Information1
- Pain1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 25, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT HAD SHIN PAIN AND THE CAUSE WAS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 1 MONTH POST PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE TIBIAL TRAY, INSERT, AUGMENTS AND EXTENSION STEM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NOTES: PATIENT EXPRESSED SHIN PAIN FROM THE 11X150 STEM EXTENSION. THE ORIGINAL TIBIAL COMPONENT WITH TIBIAL AUGMENTS, AND STEM EXTENSION WERE REMOVED. A SHORT STEM EXTENSION WAS UTILIZED WITH ORIGINAL SIZE AUGMENTS WAS USED.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 19826861 ↗InjuryMar 21, 2023Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
AT ABOUT 5 YEARS AND 5 MONTHS AFTER THE SYSTEM HAS BEEN IMPLANTED, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO TIBIAL TRAY LOOSENING AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED SUCCESSFULLY THE TIBIAL TRAY AND INSERT. THE PATIENT WAS PREVIOUSLY REVISED FROM COMPETITOR TO MEDACTA IMPLANTS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 16583851 ↗InjuryAug 29, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
ON (B)(4) 2019 WE RECEIVED THE INFORMATION OF A REVISION SURGERY, THAT WAS THEN PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019, DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION (THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN). THE SURGEON REMOVED ALL IMPLANTS FROM THE PATIENT AND IMPLANTED AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 8945082 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices
- ATTUNE 1506-00-005Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER589 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-004Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER580 reports
- JOURNEY 74012812Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER502 reports
- JOURNEY 74011856Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER438 reports
- PERSONA™ 42-5099-094-00Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER406 reports
- JOURNEY 74011857Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER388 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-007Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER288 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-003Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER271 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page