Skip to content

GMK Revision Total Knee System 02.07.0683LRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Revision Fixed tibial tray cemented Left, size 3 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of GMK Revision Total Knee System (71)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030819360), received between Aug 29, 2019 and Jul 25, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information1
  • Pain1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 25, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT HAD SHIN PAIN AND THE CAUSE WAS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 1 MONTH POST PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE TIBIAL TRAY, INSERT, AUGMENTS AND EXTENSION STEM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NOTES: PATIENT EXPRESSED SHIN PAIN FROM THE 11X150 STEM EXTENSION. THE ORIGINAL TIBIAL COMPONENT WITH TIBIAL AUGMENTS, AND STEM EXTENSION WERE REMOVED. A SHORT STEM EXTENSION WAS UTILIZED WITH ORIGINAL SIZE AUGMENTS WAS USED.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 19826861 ↗
  • InjuryMar 21, 2023Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    AT ABOUT 5 YEARS AND 5 MONTHS AFTER THE SYSTEM HAS BEEN IMPLANTED, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO TIBIAL TRAY LOOSENING AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED SUCCESSFULLY THE TIBIAL TRAY AND INSERT. THE PATIENT WAS PREVIOUSLY REVISED FROM COMPETITOR TO MEDACTA IMPLANTS.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 16583851 ↗
  • InjuryAug 29, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    ON (B)(4) 2019 WE RECEIVED THE INFORMATION OF A REVISION SURGERY, THAT WAS THEN PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019, DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION (THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN). THE SURGEON REMOVED ALL IMPLANTS FROM THE PATIENT AND IMPLANTED AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8945082 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page