Skip to content

GMK Primary Total Knee System 02.07.1201LRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Fixed tibial tray cemented left, size 1 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of GMK Primary Total Knee System (99)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030819841), received between Jan 4, 2018 and May 13, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (1 report).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K090988); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
  • Device Slipped1
  • Implant subsidence1
  • Migration1
  • Migration or Expulsion of Device1
  • No Apparent Adverse Event1

Patient problems

  • Pain2
  • Joint Disorder1
  • Joint Laxity1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 13, 2026No Apparent Adverse Event

    THE SURGEON EXPERIENCED DIFFICULTY INSERTING THE EFFICIENCY 10 MM LEFT INSERT INTO A SIZE 1 LEFT CEMENTED TIBIAL BASEPLATE, REQUIRING MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS. THE PATIENT ACHIEVED FULL EXTENSION WITH A ROM OF 120°, WITH NO TIGHTNESS ISSUES. DIFFICULTY WAS ALSO ENCOUNTERED WHEN INSERTING THE DEFINITIVE 10 MM POLYETHYLENE INSERT, LEADING TO DAMAGE TO ITS POSTERIOR ASPECT AFTER REPEATED ATTEMPTS. AN 11 MM INSERT WAS THEN TRIED, ALSO WITH MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS, AND WAS ULTIMATELY FORCEFULLY IMPACTED USING A TIBIAL IMPACTOR. THE PROCEDURE TIME WAS EXTENDED BY APPROXIMATELY 45 MINUTES.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25160337 ↗
  • InjuryJul 31, 2025Implant subsidence; Implant subsidence

    6 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH PAIN DUE TO COLLAPSE OF THE LATERAL TIBIAL BONE. DURING THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE TIBIAL COMPONENT HAD BEEN SLIGHTLY UNDERSIZED, AND THE PATIENT HAD SOFT BONE. THE SURGEON REVISED THE TIBIAL TRAY AND INSERT, AND IMPLANTED A STEM EXTENSION ALONG WITH TIBIAL AUGMENTS. THE REVISION SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 22673493 ↗
  • InjuryMay 23, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 1 YEAR 3 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REMOVED ALL COMPONENTS AND IMPLANTED AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 19381855 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 23, 2024Migration; Migration

    ABOUT 7 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, REVISION SURGERY HAS BEEN PERFORMED DUE TO TIBIAL SUBSIDENCE.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 18765773 ↗
  • InjuryDec 15, 2023Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration or Expulsion of Device

    REVISION SURGERY DUE TO TIBIAL TRAY FIXED CEMENTED SIZE 1 SUBSIDENCE AND KNEE INSTABILITY, AT ABOUT 2 YEARS 10 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY. ALL COMPONENTS SUCCESSFULLY REVISED WITH COMPETITOR'S SYSTEM.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 18334828 ↗
  • InjuryJan 4, 2018Device Slipped

    THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THE TIBIAL BASEPLATE HAD SUBSIDED. THE SURGEON REVISED THE TIBIAL BASEPLATE AND THE POLY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 7163357 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K090988. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0266-2018 · Oct 24, 2017 · Terminated
    The GMK knee system: designed for cemented use in total knee arthroplasty. Sphere and Primary Inserts with part number ranges: 02.12.0110FL - 02.12.0620FL; 02.12.0110FR - 02.12.0

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page