Skip to content

GMK Primary Total Knee System 02.07.2214RRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Femur Narrow cemented PS Right, size 4 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of GMK Primary Total Knee System (99)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030820991), received between Oct 20, 2017 and Oct 27, 2022 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Failure To Adhere Or Bond1

Patient problems

  • Joint Disorder1
  • Joint Laxity1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 27, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    AT ABOUT 3 DAYS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT LUXATED HER KNEE. DURING THE REVISION, IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO RESTORE THE CORRECT STABILITY BY USING INLAYS WITH DIFFERENT THICKNESS, SO THE WHOLE PROSTHESIS WAS REMOVED AND A HINGE SYSTEM WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 15679061 ↗
  • InjuryAug 20, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REMOVED ALL IMPLANTS 4 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY AND IMPLANTED AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8909365 ↗
  • InjuryOct 20, 2017Failure To Adhere Or Bond

    THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF STIFFNESS. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THE CEMENT (NON-MEDACTA PRODUCT) DID NOT ADHERE TO THE IMPLANTS. THE SURGEON REVISED THE FEMUR, INSERT AND TIBIAL TRAY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 6965216 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page