Skip to content

GMK Primary Total Knee System 02.07.2216LRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Femur Narrow cemented PS Left, size 6 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of GMK Primary Total Knee System (99)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030821028), received between Oct 6, 2017 and Jun 28, 2022 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Unstable” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Unstable2
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Failure To Adhere Or Bond1
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection1
  • Loss of or Failure to Bond1

Patient problems

  • Joint Disorder2
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 28, 2022Loose or Intermittent Connection; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED DUE TO CEMENTED TIBIAL AND FEMUR LOOSENING, 5 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 14840042 ↗
  • InjuryOct 17, 2018Loss of or Failure to Bond; Unstable

    THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF INSTABILITY THREE YEARS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THAT THE CEMENT DID NOT ADHERE TO THE IMPLANTS, HE REMOVED THE FEMUR, TIBIA AND INSERT. THE PATELLA REMAINED, AS IT WAS WELL FIXED. PALACOS CEMENT WAS USED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 7973277 ↗
  • InjuryOct 6, 2017Failure To Adhere Or Bond; Unstable

    THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF INSTABILITY. UPON REMOVAL OF THE COMPONENTS THE SURGEON DETERMINED THE CEMENT DID NOT ADHERE TO THE TIBIAL BASEPLATE. THE SURGEON REVISED THE FEMUR, INSERT AND TIBIAL TRAY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 6921702 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page