Skip to content

GMK Total Knee System 02.07.2802LRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Tibial tray fixed cemented #2 L TiNbN coated · Class 2 · Implant

All models of GMK Total Knee System (31)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030821783), received between Apr 24, 2025 and Dec 19, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2

Patient problems

  • Aseptic loosening2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 19, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 10 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY DUE TO TIBIAL TRAY LOOSENING. X-RAYS SHOWED THE PROSTHESIS TO BE CORRECTLY POSITIONED, ALTHOUGH THE PATIENT REPORTED PAIN AND THE BONE SCAN SHOWED INCREASED UPTAKE. DURING REVISION, NO CEMENT TRACES WERE OBSERVED ON THE TIBIAL SIDE, AND ONLY A SMALL RESIDUE WAS FOUND ON THE FEMORAL SIDE.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening

    MAUDE report 23854083 ↗
  • InjuryApr 24, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    REVISION SURGERY DUE TO A LOOSE TIBIA AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 3 MONTHS POST PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED ALL COMPONENTS. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening

    MAUDE report 21899447 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page