Skip to content

GMK Hinge Total Knee System 02.09.0514HRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Fixed tibial insert # 5/14mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of GMK Hinge Total Knee System (55)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
8
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030825279), received between Jun 15, 2018 and Aug 3, 2026 — classified as 8 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (5 reports).

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K130299); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection5
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available2
  • Fracture1

Patient problems

  • Medical device site infection3
  • Unspecified Infection3
  • Hematoma1
  • No Code Available1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 3, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    Revision surgery due to infection after 21 days from primary. The surgeon performed a washout, removed all implants, and implanted a competitor femoral nail.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 50114133 ↗
  • InjuryAug 21, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT 1 YEAR AND 6 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 20019599 ↗
  • InjuryApr 4, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    REVISION SURGERY FOR INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT 2 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS POST PRIMARY THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 19040019 ↗
  • InjuryMar 1, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 6 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. PATIENT HAD COMPETITOR COMPONENTS BEFORE MEDACTA COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 18817502 ↗
  • InjuryJan 12, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 2 MONTHS AFTER MEDACTA PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. PRIMARY SURGERY WAS WITH COMPETITOR COMPONENTS. DURING REVISION OF THE COMPETITOR'S IMPLANTS, MEDACTA HINGE COMPONENTS WERE IMPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 18502390 ↗
  • InjuryMay 3, 2019Fracture; Fracture

    ON THE (B)(6) 2019 WE WERE INFORMED ABOUT A REVISION SURGERY PLANNED AND PERFORMED ON THE (B)(6) 2019. THE REVISION SURGERY WAS TWO MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY DUE TO THE POST SCREW BREAKAGE. THE SCREW WAS FOUND OUTSIDE THE IMPLANT CAUSING PAIN TO THE PATIENT. REVISION SURGERY COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY (INSERT REVISION).

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 8577871 ↗
  • InjuryApr 4, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN CAUSED BY A HEMATOMA 8 DAYS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND POLY SWAP AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Hematoma

    MAUDE report 8482795 ↗
  • InjuryJun 15, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 5 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT FOR INLAY SCREW UNSCREWING. THE SURGEON SWAPPED SUCCESSFULLY THE INLAY SCREW.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 7605412 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K130299. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2661-2017 · May 19, 2017 · Terminated
    Medacta GMK HINGE, Tibial Insert Fixed, SIZE 2, HEIGHT 23 mm, REF 02.09.0223H, STERILE EO
  • Z-0275-2016 · Apr 17, 2015 · Terminated
    GMK Hinge knee prosthesis; Model Number: 02.09.TA410; Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page