Skip to content

GMK Hinge Total Knee System 02.09.2605RRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Femoral Component Right, size 5 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of GMK Hinge Total Knee System (55)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030825484), received between Nov 17, 2017 and May 13, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (2 reports).

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K130299); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Break1
  • Fracture1

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection3
  • Bone Fracture(s)2
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Joint Laxity1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 13, 2026Fracture

    REVISION SURGERY DUE TO A FRACTURED FEMUR AFTER ABOUT 2 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE WAS NO INDICATION OF TRAUMA, BUT THE SURGEON DID NOTE POOR BONE QUALITY. THE SURGEON REVISED GMK-HINGE SIZE 5 FEMORAL COMPONENT TO A SAME SIZE FEMORAL COMPONENT AND REVISED THE GMK-HINGE 12MM INSERT TO A GMK-HINGE 14MM INSERT DUE TO LAXITY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 25160348 ↗
  • InjuryMay 11, 2021Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    REVISION SURGERY 2 YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY DUE TO FEMORAL COMPONENT LOOSENING. FEMORAL COMPONENT AND TIBIAL LINER SUCCESSFULLY REVISED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 11805150 ↗
  • InjuryJul 28, 2020Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    THE PATIENT HAD A PRIMARY KNEE SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017. ON (B)(6) 2018, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN WAS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED ALL HARDWARE AND IMPLANTED A SPACER. PRESENTLY, ON (B)(6) 2020 (2 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY), THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS PSEUDOMONAS. THE SURGEON PLANNED TO PERFORM A POLY-SWAP, BUT NOTICED DURING SURGERY THAT THE FEMORAL COMPONENT WAS LOOSE. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A POLY-SWAP AND EXTRACTED AND REPLACED WITH A HINGE FEMORAL COMPONENT WITH A STEM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 10331333 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 1, 2020Break

    THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN AFTER FEELING A POP IN HIS KNEE. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THAT THE PATIENT'S FEMUR HAD BROKEN 2 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. THERE IS NO REVISION SCHEDULED AT THIS TIME. WE DON'T KNOW IF REVISION SURGERY WILL BE PERFORMED.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 9909608 ↗
  • InjuryAug 16, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION 7 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED ALL HARDWARE AND IMPLANTED A SPACER. THE DATE IN WHICH THE SPACER WAS IMPLANTED IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON IMPLANTED PERMANENT HARDWARE ON (B)(6) 2018.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 7788798 ↗
  • InjuryNov 17, 2017Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    PROSTHESIS WAS EXPLANTED DUE TO A REPEAT INFECTION. THE COMPLETE PROSTHESES HAS BEEN EXPLANTED AND A CEMENT SPACER WITH ANTIBIOTIC HAS BEEN PUT IN. THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 7040106 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K130299. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2661-2017 · May 19, 2017 · Terminated
    Medacta GMK HINGE, Tibial Insert Fixed, SIZE 2, HEIGHT 23 mm, REF 02.09.0223H, STERILE EO
  • Z-0275-2016 · Apr 17, 2015 · Terminated
    GMK Hinge knee prosthesis; Model Number: 02.09.TA410; Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page