Skip to content

GMK Sphere Total Knee System 02.12.0212FRRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Tibial Insert Fixed SPHERE Flex #2/12 mm R · Class 2 · Implant

All models of GMK Sphere Total Knee System (209)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
12
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
12
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030826184), received between Jul 25, 2017 and Aug 27, 2025 — classified as 12 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2
  • Migration2
  • Defective Component1
  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
  • Device Issue1
  • Device Slipped1
  • Unintended Movement1

Patient problems

  • Joint Laxity3
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
  • Discomfort1
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Implant Pain1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Joint Disorder1
  • Medical device site infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 27, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE PATIENT CAME HAD A KNEE INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT 2 YEARS AND 5 MONTHS POST PRIMARY THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 22901809 ↗
  • InjuryDec 15, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    ABOUT 10 YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING ANTERIOR KNEE PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE PATELLA IMPLANT. THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATELLA IMPLANT WITH A COMPETITOR'S PRODUCT AND REVISED THE 12MM MEDACTA INSERT WITH A 13MM MEDACTA INSERT, DUE TO GLOBAL LAXITY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain; Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 18333478 ↗
  • InjuryJun 20, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION SURGERY FOR KNEE INSTABILITY AT ABOUT 4 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS POST-PRIMARY. LINER WAS REVISED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A THICKER ONE (FROM 12MM TO 17MM).

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 17161348 ↗
  • InjuryOct 11, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 5 MONTHS, THE SURGEON REVISED THE INSERT WITH A HIGHER ONE (FROM 12 TO 13 MM), AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 15575843 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2021Migration; Migration

    5 YEARS AND 3 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY REVISION SURGERY FOR LINER FIXATION SCREW UNSCREWING. LINER REVISED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12231414 ↗
  • InjuryAug 3, 2020Migration; Migration

    THE PATIENT CAME IN 3 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY FOR A POST-OP APPOINTMENT AND IT WAS OBSERVED THAT A SCREW FROM THE TIBIAL INSERT HAD LOOSENED. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE POLY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 10354785 ↗
  • InjuryJul 1, 2020Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    REVISION OF A GMK SPHERE PROSTHESIS 9 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO LAXITY (SPECIALLY IN FLEXION). THE SURGEON REVISED THE INLAY AND CHANGE TO A 14MM INLAY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 10217919 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 11, 2019Unstable

    THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF INSTABILITY 10 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE POLY, 12 MM, WITH A THICKER IMPLANT, 14 MM. THE TIBIAL TRAY WAS REVISED AS WELL, EXTENSION STEM AND AUGMENTION WERE USED IN THE REVISION SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 8325131 ↗
  • InjuryJul 18, 2018Device Slipped

    THE SCREW HAD BACKED OUT AND GOT LODGED BETWEEN THE POLY AND THE FEMORAL COMPONENT 1 YEAR AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE SCREW AND THE POLY, DID AN EXTENSIVE DEBRIDEMENT, TRIALED DIFFERENT SIZE POLY AND DECIDED TO GO FROM A 12 TO A 14MM POLY. THE FEMUR, TIBIA AND PATELLA WERE ALL WELL FIXED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7698440 ↗
  • InjuryMay 29, 2018Defective Component

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION ABOUT TWO YEARS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGEON NOTICED A DEFECT UNDER THE TIBIAL IMPLANT WHICH THE SURGEON PACKED WITH ANTIBIOTIC BEADS. THE SURGEON PERFORMED AN I & D AND A POLY SWAP. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. PATHOGEN WAS STAPHYLOCOCCUS.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 7549096 ↗
  • InjuryMay 23, 2018Unintended Movement

    ON (B)(6) 2018 WE WERE INFORMED THAT A PATIENT HAD PRESENTED TO CLINIC WITH ANTERIOR KNEE PAIN. X RAY SHOWED PARTIAL BACK OUT OF THE TIBIAL INSERT SCREW. ON (B)(6) 2018 SURGEON ARTHROSCOPIC REMOVED THE INLAY LOCKING SCREW DUE TO UNSCREWING.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain

    MAUDE report 7536828 ↗
  • InjuryJul 25, 2017Device Issue; Device Issue

    THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF DISCOMFORT. THE SURGEON TOOK X-RAYS WHICH REVEALED LOOSE SCREW. THE SURGEON SWAPPED THE POLY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. X-RAYS ARE AVAILABLE. EXPLANTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Discomfort

    MAUDE report 6740146 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page