GMK Sphere Total Knee System 02.12.0212FRRecalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · Tibial Insert Fixed SPHERE Flex #2/12 mm R · Class 2 · Implant
All models of GMK Sphere Total Knee System (209)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 12
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 12
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030826184), received between Jul 25, 2017 and Aug 27, 2025 — classified as 12 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2
- Migration2
- Defective Component1
- Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
- Device Issue1
- Device Slipped1
- Unintended Movement1
Patient problems
- Joint Laxity3
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- Discomfort1
- Failure of Implant1
- Implant Pain1
- Insufficient Information1
- Joint Disorder1
- Medical device site infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryAug 27, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
THE PATIENT CAME HAD A KNEE INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT 2 YEARS AND 5 MONTHS POST PRIMARY THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 22901809 ↗InjuryDec 15, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
ABOUT 10 YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING ANTERIOR KNEE PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE PATELLA IMPLANT. THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATELLA IMPLANT WITH A COMPETITOR'S PRODUCT AND REVISED THE 12MM MEDACTA INSERT WITH A 13MM MEDACTA INSERT, DUE TO GLOBAL LAXITY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Implant Pain; Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 18333478 ↗InjuryJun 20, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
REVISION SURGERY FOR KNEE INSTABILITY AT ABOUT 4 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS POST-PRIMARY. LINER WAS REVISED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A THICKER ONE (FROM 12MM TO 17MM).
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 17161348 ↗InjuryOct 11, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 5 MONTHS, THE SURGEON REVISED THE INSERT WITH A HIGHER ONE (FROM 12 TO 13 MM), AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 15575843 ↗InjuryJul 27, 2021Migration; Migration
5 YEARS AND 3 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY REVISION SURGERY FOR LINER FIXATION SCREW UNSCREWING. LINER REVISED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 12231414 ↗InjuryAug 3, 2020Migration; Migration
THE PATIENT CAME IN 3 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY FOR A POST-OP APPOINTMENT AND IT WAS OBSERVED THAT A SCREW FROM THE TIBIAL INSERT HAD LOOSENED. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE POLY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10354785 ↗InjuryJul 1, 2020Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
REVISION OF A GMK SPHERE PROSTHESIS 9 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO LAXITY (SPECIALLY IN FLEXION). THE SURGEON REVISED THE INLAY AND CHANGE TO A 14MM INLAY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 10217919 ↗InjuryFeb 11, 2019Unstable
THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF INSTABILITY 10 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE POLY, 12 MM, WITH A THICKER IMPLANT, 14 MM. THE TIBIAL TRAY WAS REVISED AS WELL, EXTENSION STEM AND AUGMENTION WERE USED IN THE REVISION SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 8325131 ↗InjuryJul 18, 2018Device Slipped
THE SCREW HAD BACKED OUT AND GOT LODGED BETWEEN THE POLY AND THE FEMORAL COMPONENT 1 YEAR AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE SCREW AND THE POLY, DID AN EXTENSIVE DEBRIDEMENT, TRIALED DIFFERENT SIZE POLY AND DECIDED TO GO FROM A 12 TO A 14MM POLY. THE FEMUR, TIBIA AND PATELLA WERE ALL WELL FIXED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7698440 ↗InjuryMay 29, 2018Defective Component
THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION ABOUT TWO YEARS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGEON NOTICED A DEFECT UNDER THE TIBIAL IMPLANT WHICH THE SURGEON PACKED WITH ANTIBIOTIC BEADS. THE SURGEON PERFORMED AN I & D AND A POLY SWAP. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. PATHOGEN WAS STAPHYLOCOCCUS.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 7549096 ↗InjuryMay 23, 2018Unintended Movement
ON (B)(6) 2018 WE WERE INFORMED THAT A PATIENT HAD PRESENTED TO CLINIC WITH ANTERIOR KNEE PAIN. X RAY SHOWED PARTIAL BACK OUT OF THE TIBIAL INSERT SCREW. ON (B)(6) 2018 SURGEON ARTHROSCOPIC REMOVED THE INLAY LOCKING SCREW DUE TO UNSCREWING.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 7536828 ↗InjuryJul 25, 2017Device Issue; Device Issue
THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF DISCOMFORT. THE SURGEON TOOK X-RAYS WHICH REVEALED LOOSE SCREW. THE SURGEON SWAPPED THE POLY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. X-RAYS ARE AVAILABLE. EXPLANTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Discomfort
MAUDE report 6740146 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices
- ATTUNE 1506-00-005Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER589 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-004Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER580 reports
- JOURNEY 74012812Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER502 reports
- JOURNEY 74011856Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER438 reports
- PERSONA™ 42-5099-094-00Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER406 reports
- JOURNEY 74011857Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER388 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-007Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER288 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-003Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER271 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page