GMK Sphere Total Knee System 02.12.0410FRRecalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · Tibial Insert Fixed SPHERE Flex #4/10 mm R · Class 2 · Implant
All models of GMK Sphere Total Knee System (209)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Medacta GMK Sphere tibial insert is a plastic part of a knee replacement. Many of its 88 reports describe infections and knee instability, and some describe the insert not engaging with the tray. The reports include 85 injuries and no deaths. Reports fell from 10 in the prior 12 months to 5 in the last 12 months. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 87
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 84
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 87 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030826542), received between Jul 31, 2017 and May 26, 2026 — classified as 84 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (10 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available31
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem24
- Device Appears to Trigger Rejection10
- Loose or Intermittent Connection4
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated3
- Insufficient Device Problem Information3
- Unstable3
- Device Slipped2
Patient problems
- Unspecified Infection30
- Joint Laxity24
- Joint Disorder7
- Medical device site infection7
- Implant Pain5
- Loss of Range of Motion4
- Pain3
- Insufficient Information2
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 87 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 26, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
THE PATIENT HAD HIP INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT 3 YEAR AND 1 MONTH POST PRIMARY THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE FLEX S4R - 10MM INSERT TO A SAME SIZE INSERT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 25275474 ↗MalfunctionMay 13, 2026No Apparent Adverse Event
THE 10 MM INSERT DID NOT ENGAGE WITH THE TIBIAL TRAY. A 14 MM INSERT WAS USED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE DELAY TIME WAS 30 MINUTES (TOTAL SURGERY TIME WAS 2.5 HOURS)DUE TO THE SURGEON`S ATTEMPTING TO PLACE THE INSERT ONTO THE TRAY MULTIPLE TIMES.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25160342 ↗InjuryApr 20, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT ABOUT 3 YEARS 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING ANTERIOR KNEE PAIN AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON RESURFACED THE PATIENT`S NATURAL PATELLA AND REVISED THE INSERT (10 MM TO 13MM). THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 24924652 ↗InjuryNov 28, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
FOUR YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH KNEE INSTABILITY. THE SURGEON UPSIZED THE INSERT FROM 10 MM TO 14 MM, AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 23669507 ↗InjuryJul 21, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 2 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE TIBIAL INSERT WAS REMOVED DUE TO INFECTION AND A WASHOUT WAS PERFORMED. THE SURGEON IMPLANTED A NEW INSERT OF THE SAME SIZE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 22554192 ↗InjuryJul 15, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT ABOUT 11 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN.THE SURGEON PERFORMED A POLY SWAP, INCREASING THE SIZE FROM 10MM TO 20MM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 22505891 ↗InjuryJun 6, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 2 AND A HALF MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON UPSIZED THE LINER (FROM 10MM TO 12MM) AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 22159531 ↗InjuryMay 13, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT HAD STIFFNESS AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT 3 YEARS AND 1 MONTH POST PRIMARY THE SURGEON REMOVED SCAR TISSUE AND REVISED THE POLY PER STANDARD PROCEDURE, IMPLANTING ONE OF THE SAME THICKNESS. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. IMPLANTED: 02.12.0410FR GMK-SPHERE TIBIAL INSERT - FLEX S4R - 10 MM 2309249.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 22010827 ↗InjuryMay 7, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
REVISION SURGERY FOR LINER DISSOCIATION AT 3 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY. LINER SUCCESSFULLY REVISED (10 TO 14 MM).
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 21975205 ↗InjuryApr 4, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT ABOUT 2 YEARS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE INSERT (10MM) WITH A THICKER ONE (13MM) AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 21772093 ↗InjuryMar 14, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
ON (B)(6) 2024, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT PRIMARY SURGERY WITH IMPLANTATION OF GMK-SPHERE COMPONENTS WITHOUT RESURFACING PATELLA. ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT CAME IN AND STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS INFECTION IS SUSPECTED. WOUND WITH DRAINAGE UP TO THE PROSTHESIS. NO LOOSENING OF THE COMPONENTS. THE SURGEON REVISED SUCCESSFULLY THE TIBIAL INSERT.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 21606146 ↗InjuryFeb 26, 2025Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
AT ABOUT 2 YEARS 11 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF MID FLEXION INSTABILITY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE INSERT (10 MM TO 14 MM) AND RESURFACED THE PATIENT'S NATURAL PATELLA. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 21467672 ↗InjuryNov 20, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 2 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 20731657 ↗InjuryNov 6, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT 4 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING ANTERIOR KNEE PAIN AND INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON RESURFACED THE NATURAL PATELLA AND UPSIZED THE INSERT (FROM 10 TO 12MM). THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 20623473 ↗InjuryOct 17, 2024Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
AT ABOUT 3 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY AND POSSIBLE LOOSENING OF JOINT STABILITY OVER TIME, WITH CONSEQUENT PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN. THE SURGEON REVISED SUCCESSFULLY THE LINER (10MM) WITH A THICKER ONE (13MM) AND RESURFACED PATIENT'S PATELLA BONE.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 20469755 ↗InjuryOct 15, 2024Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
AT 5 YEARS AND 5 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE LINER FROM A 10MM TO 13MM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 20449841 ↗InjurySep 3, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY 2 YEARS AND 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY. THE SURGEON UPSIZED THE POLY AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 20124868 ↗InjuryAug 22, 2024Migration; Migration
THE PATIENT HAD PAIN AND LIMITED RANGE OF MOTION, DUE TO THE SCREW DISASSOCIATING WITH THE POLY AND MIGRATING TO THE POSTERIOR CONDYLE. AT ABOUT 9 YEARS AND 5 MONTHS POST PRIMARY THE SURGEON REMOVED THE SCREW AND REVISED THE 10MM POLY WITH ANOTHER 10MM POLY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE AGENT CONFIRMED THAT THE TORQUE LIMITING SCREWDRIVER WAS NOT UTILIZED IN THE PRIMARY SURGERY.
Patient problems: Implant Pain; Loss of Range of Motion
MAUDE report 20034475 ↗InjuryJul 3, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT ABOUT 2 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT HAS BEEN REVISED BECAUSE OF PATELLO-FEMORAL DISSATISFACTION SINCE AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY. THE CAUSE OF THIS DISSATISFACTION IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON RESURFACED SUCCESSFULLY THE PATELLA BONE AND REVISED THE INSERT (10MM) WITH A THICKER ONE (11MM) TO GIVE THE PATIENT MORE STABILITY.
Patient problems: Discomfort
MAUDE report 19666931 ↗InjuryDec 22, 2023Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
AT ABOUT 4 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT WAS REVISED BECAUSE OF INSTABILITY. THE LINER WAS CHANGED WITH A THICKER ONE (10MM TO 14MM) AND PATELLAR BONE HAS BEEN RESURFACED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 18386908 ↗InjuryOct 10, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT 2 YEARS AND 5 MONTHS POST PRIMARY THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 17904734 ↗InjurySep 28, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT ABOUT 7 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY AND LAXITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE LINER (10 TO 12 MM) AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 17834221 ↗InjurySep 11, 2023Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 2 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 17717640 ↗InjuryJul 18, 2023Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 17342462 ↗InjuryMay 24, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 6 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT CAME REPORTING ANTERIOR PAIN AND INSTABILITY OF THE RIGHT KNEE. NO INFECTION. NO LOOSENING OF THE IMPLANTS. THE SURGEON REVISED SUCCESSFULLY THE INSERT (10MM) WITH A THICKER ONE (11MM).
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 16992798 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices
- ATTUNE 1506-00-005Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER589 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-004Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER580 reports
- JOURNEY 74012812Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER502 reports
- JOURNEY 74011856Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER438 reports
- PERSONA™ 42-5099-094-00Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER406 reports
- JOURNEY 74011857Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER388 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-007Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER288 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-003Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER271 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page