Skip to content

Mectalif Oblique 03.26.045Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Oblique Interbody Fusion Device 12x28x10 L5° · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030830648), received between Dec 21, 2018 and Feb 29, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Deformation” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Deformation1
  • Migration or Expulsion of Device1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 29, 2024Material Deformation; Material Deformation

    SURGERY WAS PERFORMED AT L4-L5. AFTER INSERTING THE MECTALIF OBLIQUE (TI PEEK) CAGE, WHEN THE SURGEON WAS TRYING TO ADJUST THE POSITION BY USING THE FINAL IMPACTOR (REF03.22.10.0263), HE DISCOVERED THAT THE THREAD OF THE CAGE WAS DAMAGED. THE REMOVER COULD NOT BE CONNECTED WITH THE CAGE ANYMORE. COMPETITOR'S INSTRUMENT WERE USED TO REMOVE THE DAMAGED CAGE AND A NEW CAGE WAS IMPLANTED. DELAY TIME 1 HOUR (TOTAL TIME OF THE SURGERY 5 HOURS).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18807331 ↗
  • InjuryDec 21, 2018Migration or Expulsion of Device

    TLIF SURGERY PERFORMED AT L4-L6 WITH MYSPINE MC GUIDE ON (B)(6) 2018. AT THAT TIME THE SURGEON FELT THE PEDICLE SCREWS MIGHT BE LOOSENED DURING COMPRESSION AT L5-L6, SO IN ORDER TO STRENGTHEN THE FIXATION, THE SURGEON USED TOTAL 2 CROSS CONNECTORS. THE PATIENT ALLEGED PAIN ABOUT 2 WEEKS LATER AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE SURGEON DISCOVERED THE MECTALIF OBLIQUE CAGE IMPLANTED AT L5-L6 WAS MIGRATED TO POSTERIOR SIDE IN THE X-RAY. REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ON (B)(6)(1 MONTH AND A HALF AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY), AT THAT TIME THE SURGEON REPLACED THE PEDICLE SCREW WITH NEW ONE AND IMPACTED THE SAME MECTALIF OBLIQUE CAGE INTO THE INTERVERTEBRAL DISC SPACE AGAIN.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 8188869 ↗

Other Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar devices

All Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page