Skip to content

M.U.S.T. Polyaxial Pedicle Screw 03.52.321Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Enh. Cann. Pedicle Screw 6x30mm + Nut (1x) Sterile · Class 2 · Implant

All models of M.U.S.T. Polyaxial Pedicle Screw (25)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 07630030857560), received between May 14, 2024 and May 14, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient Device Interaction Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Implant Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 14, 2024Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO LACK OF FUSION ON LEFT L5/S1. IT IS UNKNOWN WHY THIS OCCURRED. AT 1 YEAR AND 4 MONTHS POST PRIMARY THE SURGEON REMOVED ALL IMPLANTS AND REIMPLANTED NEW IMPLANTS. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 19307529 ↗

Other Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Intervertebral Body devices

All Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Intervertebral Body devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page