GMK Sphere Total Knee System 02.12.0022RRecalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · Femur Sphere cemented Right, size 2+ · Class 2 · Implant
All models of GMK Sphere Total Knee System (209)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 12
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 11
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030862366), received between Aug 25, 2017 and Jan 10, 2025 — classified as 11 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available6
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2
- Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
- Loose or Intermittent Connection1
- Positioning Failure1
- Unstable1
Patient problems
- Joint Disorder4
- Joint Laxity2
- Unspecified Infection2
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- Implant Pain1
- Insufficient Information1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 10, 2025Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure
THE TRIAL FITTED INTO THE PATIENT'S PREPARED FEMUR WITHOUT ANY PROBLEMS, BUT THE IMPLANT WITH CEMENT DID NOT FIT (LOT 2346925). THE SURGEON TRIED TO HAMMER THE IMPLANT, BUT THERE WAS A GAP OF 5 - 6MM, SO THE SURGEON REMOVED IT. THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO INSERT A SECOND FEMUR OF THE SAME REFERENCE BUT DIFFERENT LOT (2412734) BUT HE WAS NOT ABLE TO FIT IT IN ON THE FEMUR. SO THE SURGEON MADE AN ADDITIONAL CUT BY FREE HAND IN THE FEMUR, RECEMENTED AND PLACED THE SECOND USED FEMUR TESTED BEFORE (2412734). THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE DELAY TIME WAS 30 MINUTES.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21122125 ↗InjuryOct 21, 2024Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
AT ABOUT 5 YEARS 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE INSERT AND FEMUR. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 20493338 ↗InjuryMay 24, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
AT 6 YEARS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE FEMUR AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE FEMUR IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE FEMORAL COMPONENT AND INSERT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 19389764 ↗InjurySep 26, 2022Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REMOVED ALL COMPONENTS, PERFORMED A WASHOUT, AND REIMPLANTED PERMANENT HARDWARE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 15484039 ↗InjuryApr 13, 2022Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
AT 3 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS POST PRIMARY REVISION SURGERY FOR KNEE INSTABILITY. THE REASON OF INSTABILITY IS UNKNOWN. ALL COMPONENTS HAVE BEEN REVISED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 14101037 ↗InjuryDec 10, 2021Loose or Intermittent Connection; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
AT 10 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY DUE TO LOOSE LIGAMENTS THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE LIGAMENTS IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE FEMORAL COMPONENT AND INSERT.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 12974187 ↗InjuryDec 19, 2019Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
THE PATIENT FELL DOWN ON NOV 24. THEN THE SURGEON DISCOVERED THAT THE PROSTHESIS SUBLUXATED, IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE REASON FOR SUBLUXATION IS THE FALL OR IF THE PROSTHESIS SUBLUXED BEFORE. REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED SUCCESSFULLY, 5 WEEKS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY, AND GMK HINGE HAS BEEN IMPLANTED. NO CEMENT WAS FOUND ON THE EXPLANTS. THE TIBIA HAS BEEN REMOVED WITHOUT ANY DIFFICULTY DESPITE THE CEMENTATION WAS PERFORMED CORRECTLY DURING PRIMARY SURGERY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 9494689 ↗InjuryJul 4, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
ABOUT 5 MONTHS AND A HALF AFTER PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT KNEE FOR A INFECTION. THE PATIENT HAD A SEPTIC ARTHRITIS. FEMUR, TIBIA AND INSERT REVISED SUCCESSFULLY. THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 8762570 ↗InjuryJul 4, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED SUCCESSFULLY 7 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE FEMORAL COMPONENT, TIBIAL TRAY, AND POLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 8762568 ↗InjuryFeb 26, 2019Unstable
THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN CAUSED BY INSTABILITY 4 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE FEMORAL COMPONENT AND THE POLY AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 8370491 ↗InjuryApr 12, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN 9 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY: SHE HAD A FLEXION CONTRACTURE. THE SURGEON REVISED ALL HARDWARE EXCEPT THE PATELLA AND IMPLANTED A PS SYSTEM.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 7425010 ↗InjuryAug 25, 2017Insufficient Device Problem Information
AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT ALLEGED THE PAIN. X-RAYS WAS TAKEN SEVERAL DAYS AFTER AND FOUND THE BONE FRACTURE. HOSPITALIZATION WAS PROLONGED.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 6819955 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices
- ATTUNE 1506-00-005Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER589 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-004Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER580 reports
- JOURNEY 74012812Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER502 reports
- JOURNEY 74011856Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER438 reports
- PERSONA™ 42-5099-094-00Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER406 reports
- JOURNEY 74011857Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER388 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-007Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER288 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-003Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER271 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page