Skip to content

GMK Sphere Total Knee System 02.12.0022RRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Femur Sphere cemented Right, size 2+ · Class 2 · Implant

All models of GMK Sphere Total Knee System (209)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
12
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
11
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030862366), received between Aug 25, 2017 and Jan 10, 2025 — classified as 11 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available6
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2
  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection1
  • Positioning Failure1
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • Joint Disorder4
  • Joint Laxity2
  • Unspecified Infection2
  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Implant Pain1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 10, 2025Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure

    THE TRIAL FITTED INTO THE PATIENT'S PREPARED FEMUR WITHOUT ANY PROBLEMS, BUT THE IMPLANT WITH CEMENT DID NOT FIT (LOT 2346925). THE SURGEON TRIED TO HAMMER THE IMPLANT, BUT THERE WAS A GAP OF 5 - 6MM, SO THE SURGEON REMOVED IT. THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO INSERT A SECOND FEMUR OF THE SAME REFERENCE BUT DIFFERENT LOT (2412734) BUT HE WAS NOT ABLE TO FIT IT IN ON THE FEMUR. SO THE SURGEON MADE AN ADDITIONAL CUT BY FREE HAND IN THE FEMUR, RECEMENTED AND PLACED THE SECOND USED FEMUR TESTED BEFORE (2412734). THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE DELAY TIME WAS 30 MINUTES.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21122125 ↗
  • InjuryOct 21, 2024Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    AT ABOUT 5 YEARS 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE INSERT AND FEMUR. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 20493338 ↗
  • InjuryMay 24, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    AT 6 YEARS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE FEMUR AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE FEMUR IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE FEMORAL COMPONENT AND INSERT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 19389764 ↗
  • InjurySep 26, 2022Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REMOVED ALL COMPONENTS, PERFORMED A WASHOUT, AND REIMPLANTED PERMANENT HARDWARE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 15484039 ↗
  • InjuryApr 13, 2022Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    AT 3 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS POST PRIMARY REVISION SURGERY FOR KNEE INSTABILITY. THE REASON OF INSTABILITY IS UNKNOWN. ALL COMPONENTS HAVE BEEN REVISED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 14101037 ↗
  • InjuryDec 10, 2021Loose or Intermittent Connection; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    AT 10 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY DUE TO LOOSE LIGAMENTS THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE LIGAMENTS IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE FEMORAL COMPONENT AND INSERT.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 12974187 ↗
  • InjuryDec 19, 2019Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    THE PATIENT FELL DOWN ON NOV 24. THEN THE SURGEON DISCOVERED THAT THE PROSTHESIS SUBLUXATED, IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE REASON FOR SUBLUXATION IS THE FALL OR IF THE PROSTHESIS SUBLUXED BEFORE. REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED SUCCESSFULLY, 5 WEEKS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY, AND GMK HINGE HAS BEEN IMPLANTED. NO CEMENT WAS FOUND ON THE EXPLANTS. THE TIBIA HAS BEEN REMOVED WITHOUT ANY DIFFICULTY DESPITE THE CEMENTATION WAS PERFORMED CORRECTLY DURING PRIMARY SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 9494689 ↗
  • InjuryJul 4, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    ABOUT 5 MONTHS AND A HALF AFTER PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT KNEE FOR A INFECTION. THE PATIENT HAD A SEPTIC ARTHRITIS. FEMUR, TIBIA AND INSERT REVISED SUCCESSFULLY. THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8762570 ↗
  • InjuryJul 4, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED SUCCESSFULLY 7 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE FEMORAL COMPONENT, TIBIAL TRAY, AND POLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 8762568 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 26, 2019Unstable

    THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN CAUSED BY INSTABILITY 4 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE FEMORAL COMPONENT AND THE POLY AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 8370491 ↗
  • InjuryApr 12, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN 9 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY: SHE HAD A FLEXION CONTRACTURE. THE SURGEON REVISED ALL HARDWARE EXCEPT THE PATELLA AND IMPLANTED A PS SYSTEM.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 7425010 ↗
  • InjuryAug 25, 2017Insufficient Device Problem Information

    AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT ALLEGED THE PAIN. X-RAYS WAS TAKEN SEVERAL DAYS AFTER AND FOUND THE BONE FRACTURE. HOSPITALIZATION WAS PROLONGED.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 6819955 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page