Skip to content

GMK Sphere Total Knee System 02.12.0026RRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Femur Sphere cemented Right, size 6+ · Class 2 · Implant

All models of GMK Sphere Total Knee System (209)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
8
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030862441), received between Dec 15, 2017 and Jun 24, 2026 — classified as 8 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available3
  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Naturally Worn1
  • Osseointegration Problem1
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection3
  • Loss of Range of Motion2
  • Aseptic loosening1
  • Discomfort1
  • Joint Disorder1
  • Medical device site infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 24, 2026Naturally Worn; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION SURGERY AFTER 9 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY DUE TO PAIN AND STIFFNESS, CAUSING SAGITTAL INSTABILITY. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE SCAR TISSUE AND REVISED THE GMK-SPHERE FEMORAL COMPONENT, INSERT, AND TIBIAL TRAY TO A GMK-HINGE FEMORAL COMPONENT, INSERT, AND TIBIAL TRAY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. IT HAS BEEN REPORTED THAT THERE WERE SIGNS OF LYSIS ON THE POLYETHYLENE LINER. IT HAS BEEN HYPOTHESIZED THAT THE INSTABILITY HAVE CAUSED TIBIAL SUBSIDENCE AND SUCCESSIVE LYSIS OF THE WEAR.

    Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion

    MAUDE report 25608881 ↗
  • InjuryMay 27, 2026Osseointegration Problem

    REVISION SURGERY DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF THE KNEE IMPLANTS AFTER ABOUT 9 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE GMK-SPHERE PATELLA S4 TO A SAME SIZE PATELLA, REVISED THE SPHERE FEMUR CEMENTED RIGHT S6 + TO A GMK-HINGE FEMORAL COMPONENT SIZE 5, REVISED THE FLEX RIGHT 14MM S5 INSERT TO A GMK-HINGE SIZE5 12MM INSERT, AND REVISED THE GMK-SPHERE TIBIAL CEMENTED TRAY S5 TO A GMK-HINGE TIBIAL TRAY 5R. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening

    MAUDE report 25297689 ↗
  • InjuryMay 16, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 8 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REMOVED ALL COMPONENTS AND IMPLANTED AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 19328371 ↗
  • InjurySep 9, 2022Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE PATIENT HAD A PRIMARY KNEE SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2020. ON (B)(6) 2020, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE POLY AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. ON (B)(6) 2022, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE POLY AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. PRESENTLY, ON (B)(6) 2022, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE POLY AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 15389618 ↗
  • InjuryJul 13, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE SURGEON REVISED ALL IMPLANTS ON (B)(6) 2021 DUE TO INFECTION AND INSTALLED A CEMENT SPACER. ON (B)(6) 2021 THE SURGEON REMOVED THE CEMENT SPACER AND INSTALLED NEW IMPLANTS. THE PRIMARY SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019. THE PATIENT HAD PREVIOUSLY ((B)(6) 2020) A LINER REVISION AND WASHOUT ALSO DUE TO INFECTION.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 12157568 ↗
  • InjuryJun 7, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING DISCOMFORT AND TIGHTNESS IN THE KNEE AND THE CAUSE OF THE DISCOMFORT AND TIGHTNESS IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE FEMORAL COMPONENT, INSERT, AND ADDED AN EXTENSION STEM AND OFFSET CONNECTOR 2 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Discomfort; Loss of Range of Motion

    MAUDE report 11946022 ↗
  • InjuryDec 20, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN WAS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REMOVED ALL IMPLANTS AND IMPLANTED AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 9502122 ↗
  • InjuryDec 15, 2017Unstable

    THE PATIENT HAD A PRIMARY KNEE IMPLANT IN (B)(6) 2017. IN NOVEMBER THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF INSTABILITY. THE CAUSE OF THE INSTABILITY IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON SCHEDULED A REVISION FOR (B)(6) 2017. MORE INFORMATION TO FOLLOW THE CASE.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 7121394 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page