Skip to content

GMK Sphere Total Knee System 02.12.0213FLRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Tibial Insert Fixed SPHERE Flex #2/13 mm L · Class 2 · Implant

All models of GMK Sphere Total Knee System (209)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030862533), received between Nov 23, 2017 and Apr 30, 2024 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information1
  • Joint Dislocation1
  • Joint Disorder1
  • Joint Laxity1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 30, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING ANTERIOR KNEE PAIN AND INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE WAS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 4 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON RESURFACED THE PATIENT'S PATELLA AND REVISED THE POLY (FROM 13 TO 14 MM). THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 19213121 ↗
  • InjuryDec 17, 2020Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED DUE TO 2 YEARS AND 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE 13MM GMK SPHERE POLY LINER WAS EXCHANGED FOR A 20MM LINER, AS THE PATIENT HAS DESCRIBED A FEELING OF INSTABILITY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 11030155 ↗
  • InjuryApr 5, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED DUE TO INTRA-PROSTHETIC DISLOCATION AFTER ABOUT ONE WEEK FROM THE PRIMARY. DURING THE FINAL IMPACTION OF THE TIBIAL BASEPLATE, IN THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON NOTED PARTIAL AVULSION OF THE MCL. HE PROCEEDED TO REPAIR WITH STAPLE AND ANCHORS, NO OTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE NOTED DURING THIS CASE. AFTER ABOUT ONE WEEK FROM THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH KNEE PAIN AND COULD FEEL A ''CLICKING'' SENSATION. WITH TESTING, THERE WAS LAXITY OF THE MCL AND X-RAYS REVEALED THAT THE TIBIAL INSERT WAS DISLODGED. THE REVISION CASE CONSISTED OF A TIBIAL INSERT EXCHANGE AND MCL INTERNAL BRACE WITH 6 ANCHORS.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 7398902 ↗
  • InjuryMar 2, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    ON (B)(6) 2018 SALES REPRESENTATIVE WAS INFORMED BY THE SURGEON THAT THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THE SCREW BACKED OUT OF THE POLY. REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2018 DUE TO SCREW BACKED OUT OF THE INSERT. THE SCREW WAS NOT IMPLANTED USING A TORQUE LIMITING DRIVER. THE SURGEON IMPLANTED A NEW SCREW WITH THE INSERT. HE DID USE A TORQUE DRIVER THIS TIME AROUND.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 7309745 ↗
  • InjuryNov 23, 2017Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO DISLOCATION ANTERIOR TO THE TIBIA. THE CAUSE OF DISLOCATION IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE POLY FROM A SIZE 2 13MM MOVING TO A SIZE 2 17MM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 7057077 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page