GMK Sphere Total Knee System 02.12.0213FLRecalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · Tibial Insert Fixed SPHERE Flex #2/13 mm L · Class 2 · Implant
All models of GMK Sphere Total Knee System (209)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030862533), received between Nov 23, 2017 and Apr 30, 2024 — classified as 5 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated3
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
Patient problems
- Insufficient Information1
- Joint Dislocation1
- Joint Disorder1
- Joint Laxity1
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryApr 30, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING ANTERIOR KNEE PAIN AND INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE WAS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 4 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON RESURFACED THE PATIENT'S PATELLA AND REVISED THE POLY (FROM 13 TO 14 MM). THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 19213121 ↗InjuryDec 17, 2020Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED DUE TO 2 YEARS AND 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE 13MM GMK SPHERE POLY LINER WAS EXCHANGED FOR A 20MM LINER, AS THE PATIENT HAS DESCRIBED A FEELING OF INSTABILITY.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 11030155 ↗InjuryApr 5, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED DUE TO INTRA-PROSTHETIC DISLOCATION AFTER ABOUT ONE WEEK FROM THE PRIMARY. DURING THE FINAL IMPACTION OF THE TIBIAL BASEPLATE, IN THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON NOTED PARTIAL AVULSION OF THE MCL. HE PROCEEDED TO REPAIR WITH STAPLE AND ANCHORS, NO OTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE NOTED DURING THIS CASE. AFTER ABOUT ONE WEEK FROM THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH KNEE PAIN AND COULD FEEL A ''CLICKING'' SENSATION. WITH TESTING, THERE WAS LAXITY OF THE MCL AND X-RAYS REVEALED THAT THE TIBIAL INSERT WAS DISLODGED. THE REVISION CASE CONSISTED OF A TIBIAL INSERT EXCHANGE AND MCL INTERNAL BRACE WITH 6 ANCHORS.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 7398902 ↗InjuryMar 2, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated
ON (B)(6) 2018 SALES REPRESENTATIVE WAS INFORMED BY THE SURGEON THAT THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THE SCREW BACKED OUT OF THE POLY. REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2018 DUE TO SCREW BACKED OUT OF THE INSERT. THE SCREW WAS NOT IMPLANTED USING A TORQUE LIMITING DRIVER. THE SURGEON IMPLANTED A NEW SCREW WITH THE INSERT. HE DID USE A TORQUE DRIVER THIS TIME AROUND.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 7309745 ↗InjuryNov 23, 2017Device Dislodged or Dislocated
THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO DISLOCATION ANTERIOR TO THE TIBIA. THE CAUSE OF DISLOCATION IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE POLY FROM A SIZE 2 13MM MOVING TO A SIZE 2 17MM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 7057077 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices
- ATTUNE 1506-00-005Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER589 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-004Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER580 reports
- JOURNEY 74012812Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER502 reports
- JOURNEY 74011856Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER438 reports
- PERSONA™ 42-5099-094-00Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER406 reports
- JOURNEY 74011857Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER388 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-007Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER288 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-003Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER271 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page