GMK Sphere Total Knee System 02.12.0311FRRecalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · Tibial Insert Fixed SPHERE Flex #3/11 mm R · Class 2 · Implant
All models of GMK Sphere Total Knee System (209)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Medacta GMK Sphere total knee implant is a cemented, semi-constrained knee prosthesis with a fixed tibial insert. The 29 reports mostly describe patients years after their original surgery who came back with knee instability or looseness, joint infection, or pain, and many needed revision surgery to replace or wash out the plastic liner. All 29 reports are injuries, with no deaths. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 29
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 29
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 29 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030862588), received between Feb 8, 2018 and May 5, 2026 — classified as 29 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available11
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem9
- Device Appears to Trigger Rejection4
- Unstable3
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
- Patient-Device Incompatibility1
Patient problems
- Joint Laxity11
- Unspecified Infection10
- Medical device site infection3
- Joint Disorder2
- Pain2
- Failure of Implant1
- Implant Pain1
- Joint Dislocation1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 29 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 5, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT ABOUT 5 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING ANTERIOR KNEE PAIN AND INSTABILITY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT`S NATURAL PATELLA AND THE INSERT FOR STABILITY (FROM 11MM TO 12MM). THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Implant Pain; Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 25077216 ↗InjuryMar 12, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT ABOUT 5 YEARS 4 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY DUE TO LAXITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE POLY (11 TO 17 MM) AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 21585876 ↗InjuryOct 15, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT 1 YEAR AND 4 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 20448873 ↗InjuryJun 24, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT ABOUT 3 YEARS 9 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE OF THE INSTABILITY IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE INSERT (11 TO 14 MM). THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 19593162 ↗InjuryJun 12, 2024Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 6 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON REVISED THE LINER (FROM 11 TO 14 MM) AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 19518512 ↗InjuryFeb 6, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT ABOUT 4 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 18648759 ↗InjuryJan 31, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
HOLD FOR RW 1.31 AT ABOUT 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 18613589 ↗InjuryNov 30, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
REVISION SURGERY FOR KNEE INSTABILITY, THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT 2 YEARS FROM THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON REVISED THE INSERT TO A THICKER ONE AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 18235861 ↗InjuryOct 27, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT ABOUT 4 YEARS 10 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 18020153 ↗InjuryJun 6, 2023Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND INSTABILITY AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 2 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT, REMOVED ALL COMPONENTS AND IMPLANTED AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 17070260 ↗InjuryMar 31, 2023Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 6 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, REVISON SURGERY PERFORMED DUE TO INFECTION. THE INSERT WAS REVISED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 16655291 ↗InjurySep 19, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT ABOUT 8 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE SURGEON REVISED THE LINER WITH A THICKER ONE (FROM 11 TO 14 MM). THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 15444793 ↗InjuryAug 17, 2022Unstable
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE INSERT (11 MM TO 17 MM). THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 15240483 ↗InjuryAug 12, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT ABOUT 2 YEARS AD 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY DUE TO LAXITY AND THE CAUSE OF THE LAXITY IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE LINER (11MM) WITH A THICKER ONE (14MM) AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 15217723 ↗InjuryMar 8, 2022Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
AT 4 YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE OF THE INSTABILITY IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE INSERT (11 TO 14 MM) AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 13693396 ↗InjuryOct 18, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
AT 20 DAYS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE POLY AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 12647416 ↗InjuryJun 4, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE OF THE INSTABILITY IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE 11MM INSERT WITH A 14MM ONE TO GIVE THE PATIENT MORE STABILITY 1 YEAR AND 8 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 11938575 ↗InjuryMay 31, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT HAD A PRIMARY KNEE SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2020. ON (B)(6) 2020, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION. THE SURGEON PERFORMED AN I&D AND REVISED THE SPHERE INSERT FLEX RIGHT 11MM S3 WITH A SPHERE INSERT FLEX RIGHT 11MM S3. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. ON (B)(6) 2021, 1 YEAR AND 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION. THE SURGEON PERFORMED AN I&D AND PUT A TEMPORARY SPACER (REVISED ALL THE COMPONENTS). THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 11907495 ↗InjuryMay 17, 2021Unstable
5 YEARS AND 3 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING INSTABILITY DUE TO A HYPEREXTENDED KNEE. THE CAUSE OF THE HYPEREXTENDED KNEE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE SPHERE INSERT FLEX RIGHT 11MM S3 WITH A GMK-SPHERE TIBIAL INSERT - FLEX S3R - 17MM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 11830863 ↗InjuryJul 28, 2020Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED AN I&D AND REVISED THE POLY 11 DAYS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE SURGEON ALSO ADDED ANTIBIOTIC CEMENT. THE SAME PATIENT WAS SCHEDULED TO COME IN ON (B)(6) 2020, AND THE SURGEON CHECKED HIM TO SEE IF THERE WAS AN INFECTION (THERE WAS NOT) AND SAW THAT THE CEMENT DAMAGED THE POLY. THE SURGEON DID A POLY-SWAP AGAIN.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 10331242 ↗InjuryJun 16, 2020Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
HE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN 4 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY AND THE CAUSE OF PAIN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE FEMORAL COMPONENT, TIBIAL TRAY AND INSERT AND CONVERTED THE PATIENT TO A HINGE KNEE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 10156627 ↗InjuryMay 19, 2020Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT CAME IN, 1.5 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY, DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION. THE SURGEON PERFORMED AN I&D AND REVISED THE SPHERE INSERT FLEX RIGHT 11MM S3 WITH A SPHERE INSERT FLEX RIGHT 11MM S3. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 10069394 ↗InjuryDec 4, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED 15 DAYS AFTER THE PRIMARY DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE INSERT SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 9408356 ↗InjuryNov 18, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE MEDACTA SPHERE INSERT FLEX RIGHT 11MM S3 WITH A MEDACTA SPHERE INSERT FLEX RIGHT 11MM S3, 3 WEEKS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 9334635 ↗InjurySep 26, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
ABOUT 3 YEARS AND 3 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF INSTABILITY AND THE CAUSE OF THE INSTABILITY IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON SWAPPED THE INSERT TO A 2MM THICKER ONE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 9123019 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices
- ATTUNE 1506-00-005Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER589 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-004Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER580 reports
- JOURNEY 74012812Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER502 reports
- JOURNEY 74011856Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER438 reports
- PERSONA™ 42-5099-094-00Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER406 reports
- JOURNEY 74011857Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER388 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-007Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER288 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-003Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER271 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page