Masterloc Femoral Stems 01.39.207Recalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · Masterloc Cementless Ti Coated LAT Stem # 7 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Masterloc Femoral Stems (21)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 9
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030885679), received between Jul 13, 2018 and Mar 7, 2025 — classified as 9 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2
- Osseointegration Problem2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
- Crack1
- Loose or Intermittent Connection1
- Patient-Device Incompatibility1
Patient problems
- Hip Fracture2
- Inadequate Osseointegration2
- Pain2
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- Implant Pain1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 7, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
AT ABOUT 5 YEARS AND 3 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD WITH COMPETITOR COMPONENTS AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 21548760 ↗InjuryJul 10, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
ABOUT 8 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF THIGH PAIN. THERE WAS NO SIGN OF INFECTION BUT THE X-RAYS SHOWED SIGNS OF STEM LOOSENING. DURING THE REVISION, THE STEM WAS PERFECTLY FIXED, SO THE SURGEON PLACED A SLEEVE AND REVISED THE HEAD.
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 19711156 ↗InjuryFeb 22, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
DURING THE FIRST RECOVERY DAY, A FEMUR FRACTURE WAS DETECTED. AT 1 DAY FROM THR THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 16417235 ↗InjuryMay 13, 2022Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE STEM IS UNKNOWN. AT 3 YEARS AND 1 MONTH FROM PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD WITH COMPETITOR COMPONENTS AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 14397933 ↗InjuryAug 2, 2021Loose or Intermittent Connection
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A SUBSIDED STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE SUBSIDED STEM IS A FRACTURE OF THE FEMUR (REASON UNKNOWN). THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, HEAD, AND LINER 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Hip Fracture
MAUDE report 12258537 ↗InjuryJun 19, 2019Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED AFTER 11 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY DUE TO PAIN CAUSED BY A LOOSE STEM. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 8711047 ↗InjuryDec 14, 2018Patient-Device Incompatibility
THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN DUE TO THE STEM SUBSIDING, 8 MONTHS AND A HALF AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 8164770 ↗InjuryJul 31, 2018Crack
DURING SURGERY THE SURGEON IMPLANTED THE REAL STEM AND CRACKED THE CALCAR. THE SURGEON FELT THE IMPLANT DID NOT MATCH THE BROACH AND DUE TO THE COMPROMISED BONE AND WIRE TO FIX THE FRACTURE HE DECIDED TO GO WITH A CEMENTED SIZE 4 STANDARD STEM. THE CEMENTLESS STEM WAS DISCARDED. NO DELAY.
Patient problems: Hip Fracture
MAUDE report 7734721 ↗InjuryJul 13, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
ABOUT 1 YEAR AFTER PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT FOR A STEM SUBSIDENCE. THE SURGEON REPLACED SUCCESSFULLY THE STEM AND THE HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 7685637 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-310Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented551 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented481 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-320Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death314 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-720Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death189 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 400-03-362Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented187 reports
- Anthology 71365705Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented176 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-40-710Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented170 reports
- PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-32-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented169 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page