Skip to content

SMS Stem 01.36.067Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · SMS Solid Stem LAT #7 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of SMS Stem (28)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030888793), received between Jan 26, 2021 and May 5, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Osseointegration Problem2
  • Migration1
  • Unintended Movement1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration4

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 5, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    AT ABOUT 11 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM TO A COMPETITOR STEM AND REVISED THE MEDACTA HEAD AND LINER TO DM PRODUCTS. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. IT HAS BEEN REPORTED THAT PATIENT WAS OVERWEIGHT AND HAD MANY INFECTIONS IN THE OTHER HIP.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 21958376 ↗
  • InjuryAug 9, 2023Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    AT ABOUT 6 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD WITH COMPETITOR COMPONENTS AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 17489184 ↗
  • InjuryMay 19, 2021Unintended Movement

    THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A SUBSIDED STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE SUBSIDED STEM IS UNKNOWN. 7 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD WITH COMPETITOR IMPLANTS AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 11848754 ↗
  • InjuryJan 26, 2021Migration

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED 6 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO STEM SUBSIDENCE. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND THE HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 11229071 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page