Skip to content

STRAUMANN DENTAL IMPLANT SYSTEM SLActive Roxolid BL (REF 021.2212)Recalls & reported problems

Institut Straumann AG · Bone Level Implant, D 3.3 mm, NC, SLActive 12 mm, Roxolid · Class 2 · Implant

All models of STRAUMANN DENTAL IMPLANT SYSTEM (128)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This Straumann SLActive dental implant is placed in the jawbone to support a replacement tooth. Its 189 reports mostly describe implants that lost their bond with the bone, failed to form one, or fractured. Some reports mention infection, pain, tissue damage, or bleeding. There are 189 injury reports and no deaths. No recalls name this device. Reports fell from 20 in the year before to 7 in the latest year.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
190
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
190
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 190 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630031706423), received between Sep 9, 2019 and Jul 30, 2026 — classified as 190 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (100 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 2 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 8 reportsApr 2024: 3 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 2 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 2 reportsSep 2024: 4 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 3 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 4 reportsJul 2025: 2 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 5 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 3 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 2 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520268
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loss of Osseointegration100
  • Fracture52
  • Failure to Osseointegrate39
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions68
  • Unspecified Infection52
  • Pain38
  • Fibrosis27
  • Tissue Damage26
  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding23
  • Inflammation17
  • Failure of Implant15

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 190 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 30, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted 2017(b)(6) in FDI 32. On 2026(b)(6), loss of osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Peri-implantitis, Swelling, Bleeding, Abscess, Fistula and Inflammation. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Abscess; Fistula; Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Inflammation; Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50089177 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2012 in the patient's mouth. On (b)(6) 2026, loss of osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Peri-implantitis. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50010929 ↗
  • InjuryMay 15, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2013 IN FDI 12. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain

    MAUDE report 25189029 ↗
  • InjuryApr 7, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN ADA 23. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24806368 ↗
  • InjuryDec 29, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2011 IN FDI 36. ON (B)(6) 2025, FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT WAS VERIFIED. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23914931 ↗
  • InjuryNov 21, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2008 IN FDI 12. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23620603 ↗
  • InjuryNov 4, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2015 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. DETAILS OF SURGERY: RIDGE AUGMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23467582 ↗
  • InjuryNov 3, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2012 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. DETAILS OF SURGERY: RIDGE AUGMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2025, FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS, PAIN, MOBILITY AND SWELLING. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain; Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 23456808 ↗
  • InjuryOct 24, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2012 IN FDI 12. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS AND SWELLING. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 23382473 ↗
  • InjurySep 15, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2012 IN ADA 8. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION, PERI-IMPLANTITIS, MOBILITY AND SWELLING. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 23055671 ↗
  • InjurySep 15, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2012 IN ADA 8. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION, PERI-IMPLANTITIS, MOBILITY AND SWELLING. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 23054053 ↗
  • InjurySep 11, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2016 IN FDI 23. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 23029384 ↗
  • InjurySep 4, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2011 IN FDI 22. ON (B)(6) 2025, FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22968142 ↗
  • InjurySep 4, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2011 IN FDI 12. ON (B)(6) 2025, FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22967036 ↗
  • InjuryAug 8, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2012 IN FDI 22. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE AND RIDGE AUGMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: HYPERSENSITIVITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction

    MAUDE report 22752679 ↗
  • InjuryJul 21, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22558825 ↗
  • InjuryJul 14, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE. ON (B)(6) 2025, FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22499679 ↗
  • InjuryJun 18, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2011 IN FDI 23. DETAILS OF SURGERY: RIDGE AUGMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: BLEEDING AND INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Inflammation

    MAUDE report 22278049 ↗
  • InjuryJun 18, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2013 IN FDI 13. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22259815 ↗
  • InjuryJun 18, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2010 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. DETAILS OF SURGERY: RIDGE AUGMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE IV AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22258265 ↗
  • InjuryJun 17, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2010 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. DETAILS OF SURGERY: RIDGE AUGMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE IV AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22246557 ↗
  • InjuryMar 14, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2013 IN FDI 12. ON (B)(6) 2025 , LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III AND FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION, PERI-IMPLANTITIS, PAIN, MOBILITY, SWELLING AND BLEEDING. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Pain; Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 21609564 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 24, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6)2012 IN FDI 22. ON (B)(6)2024, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY AND SWELLING. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Swelling/ Edema

    MAUDE report 21451802 ↗
  • InjuryJan 16, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2010 IN ADA 9. DETAILS OF SURGERY: NERVE ENCROACHMENT. ON (B)(6) 2024, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III AND PREVIOUS BONE AUGMENTATION. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 21171452 ↗
  • InjuryJan 16, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2010 IN ADA 9. DETAILS OF SURGERY: NERVE ENCROACHMENT. ON (B)(6) 2024, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III AND PREVIOUS BONE AUGMENTATION. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 21171160 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page