PURE Ceramic Implants Ceramic TL (REF 031.014S)Recalls & reported problems
Institut Straumann AG · Straumann® PURE Ceramic Implant Monotype, Ø 3.3mm ND, ZLA 14mm, AH 5.5mm, ZrO2 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of PURE Ceramic Implants (16)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 11
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 11
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630031713858), received between Sep 13, 2019 and Jan 29, 2026 — classified as 11 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (10 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Osseointegrate10
- Loss of Osseointegration1
Patient problems
- Pain4
- Fibrosis3
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- Tissue Damage3
- Inflammation1
- Swelling/ Edema1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 29, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN FDI 42. ON (B)(6) 2024, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24212824 ↗InjuryOct 16, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2017 IN FDI 21. ON (B)(6) 2021, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Inflammation
MAUDE report 23315259 ↗InjuryFeb 26, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2023 IN FDI 34. ON (B)(6) 2023, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18781302 ↗InjuryApr 3, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2023 IN FDI 11. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED AND IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE. ON (B)(6) 2023 NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16669183 ↗InjurySep 2, 2022Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2022 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED AND IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2022, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain
MAUDE report 15350478 ↗InjuryAug 29, 2022Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2022 IN FDI 22. ON (B)(6) 2022, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain
MAUDE report 15313648 ↗InjuryFeb 17, 2022Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2021 IN FDI 36. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE. ON (B)(6) 2021, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND SWELLING. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Pain; Swelling/ Edema
MAUDE report 13550691 ↗InjuryJan 11, 2022Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2018 IN FDI 12. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED AND RIDGE AUGMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2019, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS, PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 13228800 ↗InjurySep 13, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2019 IN FDI 12 OF THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2019, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: Tissue Damage
MAUDE report 9032464 ↗InjurySep 13, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2019 IN FDI 41 OF THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2019, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: Tissue Damage
MAUDE report 9031765 ↗InjurySep 13, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2019 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE AND IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2019, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: Tissue Damage
MAUDE report 9025070 ↗
Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page