Skip to content

STRAUMANN DENTAL IMPLANT SYSTEM SLActive Titanium TL (REF 033.053S)Recalls & reported problems

Institut Straumann AG · Standard Plus Implant, D 4.1mm RN SLActive® 12mm, Ti · Class 2 · Implant

All models of STRAUMANN DENTAL IMPLANT SYSTEM (128)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This Straumann Standard Plus dental implant is the subject of 1,049 adverse event reports, which mention no deaths and 1,049 injuries. Most reports describe implants that lost their bond with the jawbone after placement. Some also mention infection, pain, bleeding or tissue damage. No recalls name this device.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
1,050
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1,050
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1,050 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630031714718), received between Sep 9, 2019 and Sep 10, 2026 — classified as 1,050 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (929 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 6 reportsDec 2023: 17 reportsJan 2024: 15 reportsFeb 2024: 5 reportsMar 2024: 14 reportsApr 2024: 20 reportsMay 2024: 20 reportsJun 2024: 15 reportsJul 2024: 20 reportsAug 2024: 9 reportsSep 2024: 20 reportsOct 2024: 3 reportsNov 2024: 7 reportsDec 2024: 4 reportsJan 2025: 12 reportsFeb 2025: 5 reportsMar 2025: 7 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 22 reportsJul 2025: 12 reportsAug 2025: 15 reportsSep 2025: 6 reportsOct 2025: 8 reportsNov 2025: 6 reportsDec 2025: 14 reportsJan 2026: 12 reportsFeb 2026: 10 reportsMar 2026: 12 reportsApr 2026: 4 reportsMay 2026: 13 reportsJun 2026: 4 reportsJul 2026: 6 reportsAug 2026: 4 reportsSep 2026: 2 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports20242025202622
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loss of Osseointegration929
  • Failure to Osseointegrate100
  • Fracture37
  • Unintended Movement2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Difficult to Insert1

Patient problems

  • Fibrosis373
  • Unspecified Infection342
  • Pain255
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions252
  • Tissue Damage158
  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding153
  • Inflammation144
  • Swelling/ Edema82

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 1,050 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 10, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50720209 ↗
  • InjurySep 7, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50654081 ↗
  • InjuryAug 24, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted 2012(b)(6) in FDI 23. Details of surgery: Implant surface not completely covered with bone, Ridge augmentation and Immediate extraction site. On 2026(b)(6), loss of osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Peri-implantitis and Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50416298 ↗
  • InjuryAug 17, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2008 in the patient's mouth. On (b)(6) 2026, loss of osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Peri-implantitis. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50284136 ↗
  • InjuryAug 17, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted 2011 (b)(6) in FDI 22. On 2026 (b)(6), loss of osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Pain. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 50282192 ↗
  • InjuryAug 6, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted 2013(b)(6) in the patient's mouth. Details of surgery: Sinus augmentation. On 2025(b)(6), loss of osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Infection. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50163058 ↗
  • InjuryJul 13, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2007 IN ADA 13. DETAILS OF SURGERY: RIDGE AUGMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain

    MAUDE report 25800576 ↗
  • InjuryJul 13, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2007 IN ADA 13. DETAILS OF SURGERY: RIDGE AUGMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain

    MAUDE report 25799291 ↗
  • InjuryJul 6, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2008 IN FDI 25. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION, PERI-IMPLANTITIS, PAIN, MOBILITY AND INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Inflammation; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 25723271 ↗
  • InjuryJul 6, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2009 IN ADA 5. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III AND FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 25722614 ↗
  • InjuryJul 6, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2009 IN ADA 21. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS, MOBILITY AND BLEEDING. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 25721374 ↗
  • InjuryJul 6, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2009 IN ADA 5. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III AND FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 25720548 ↗
  • InjuryJun 26, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2011 IN FDI 14. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 25639381 ↗
  • InjuryJun 8, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2022 IN FDI 15. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 25433404 ↗
  • InjuryJun 3, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2012 IN FDI 26. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain

    MAUDE report 25379449 ↗
  • InjuryJun 3, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2012 IN FDI 25. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain

    MAUDE report 25379399 ↗
  • InjuryMay 26, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2012 IN FDI 36. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 25283397 ↗
  • InjuryMay 26, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2012 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 25282842 ↗
  • InjuryMay 26, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2011 IN FDI 46. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BRUXISM. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 25281908 ↗
  • InjuryMay 21, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2007 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25245616 ↗
  • InjuryMay 21, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2009 IN FDI 46. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND SWELLING. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Pain; Swelling/ Edema

    MAUDE report 25245050 ↗
  • InjuryMay 19, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2024 n the patient's mouth. On (b)(6) 2025, non-osseointegration was verified. Patient presented with bone type III. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Peri-implantitis, Pain and Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 25220355 ↗
  • InjuryMay 19, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 25220275 ↗
  • InjuryMay 19, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (B)(6) 2025 in the patient's mouth. Details of surgery: Primary stability not achieved. On (B)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. Patient presented with bone type III. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Peri-implantitis and Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 25220251 ↗
  • InjuryMay 15, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2014 IN ADA 13. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH PREVIOUS BONE AUGMENTATION. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN, MOBILITY, INCREASED SENSITIVITY AND INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Hyperresponsive to stimuli; Inflammation; Pain

    MAUDE report 25189493 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page