Skip to content

STRAUMANN DENTAL IMPLANT SYSTEM SLActive Roxolid TL (REF 033.453S)Recalls & reported problems

Institut Straumann AG · Standard Plus Implant, D 3.3 mm, RN, SLActive 12 mm, Roxolid · Class 2 · Implant

All models of STRAUMANN DENTAL IMPLANT SYSTEM (128)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This Straumann SLActive Roxolid dental implant is placed in the jawbone to support a replacement tooth. Many of its 187 reports describe implants that fractured or lost their bond with the bone. Some mention pain, infection, or tissue damage. There are 187 injury reports and no deaths. No recalls name this device.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
186
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
186
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 186 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630031715685), received between Sep 9, 2019 and Aug 17, 2026 — classified as 186 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (96 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 4 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 8 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 3 reportsJul 2024: 2 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 2 reportsOct 2024: 2 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 5 reportsJul 2025: 3 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 2 reportsNov 2025: 2 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 2 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 2 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520268
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loss of Osseointegration96
  • Fracture82
  • Failure to Osseointegrate5
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
  • Unintended Movement1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions70
  • Fibrosis37
  • Pain37
  • Unspecified Infection35
  • Failure of Implant28
  • Tissue Damage23
  • Inflammation18
  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding14

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 186 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 17, 2026Fracture

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted 2012 (b)(6) in FDI 24. On 2026 (b)(6), fracture of the implant was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. There were no patient operative or post-operative complications reported.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50282371 ↗
  • InjuryAug 10, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (B)(6) 2010 in FDI 11. On (B)(6) 2026, loss of osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Mobility and Inflammation. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Inflammation

    MAUDE report 50198993 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted 2010-(b)(6) in FDI 11. On 2026-(b)(6), loss of osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Peri-implantitis and Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50040642 ↗
  • InjuryApr 3, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2012 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III AND FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND BLEEDING. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Pain

    MAUDE report 24779323 ↗
  • InjuryMar 30, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2013 IN ADA 26. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain

    MAUDE report 24718087 ↗
  • InjuryMar 30, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2013 IN ADA 26. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain

    MAUDE report 24717379 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 2, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2011 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. DETAILS OF SURGERY: RIDGE AUGMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Inflammation

    MAUDE report 24238892 ↗
  • InjuryJan 16, 2026Fracture

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2010 IN FDI 36. ON (B)(6) 2025, FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24098840 ↗
  • InjuryDec 29, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2010 IN FDI 36. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23911117 ↗
  • InjuryNov 14, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2010 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23559074 ↗
  • InjuryNov 14, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2010 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23558984 ↗
  • InjuryOct 27, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2013 IN ADA 5. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 23395026 ↗
  • InjuryOct 27, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2013 IN ADA 5. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 23394146 ↗
  • InjurySep 19, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2012 IN FDI 23. ON (B)(6) 2025, FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23099070 ↗
  • InjuryAug 8, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2013 IN FDI 15. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED AND IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain

    MAUDE report 22753134 ↗
  • InjuryJul 7, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2014 IN ADA 12. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE. ON (B)(6) 2025, FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22419406 ↗
  • InjuryJul 7, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2012 IN FDI 26. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22415895 ↗
  • InjuryJul 7, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2014 IN ADA 12. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE. ON (B)(6) 2025, FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22415204 ↗
  • InjuryJun 17, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2015 IN FDI 25. ON (B)(6) 2025, FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22255124 ↗
  • InjuryJun 17, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2013 IN FDI 33. ON (B)(6) 2024, FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22253308 ↗
  • InjuryJun 17, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2013 IN FDI 14. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH FAIR ORAL HYGIENE AND BRUXISM. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN, SWELLING AND INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Inflammation; Pain; Swelling/ Edema

    MAUDE report 22246879 ↗
  • InjuryJun 17, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2013 IN FDI 43. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 22241148 ↗
  • InjuryJun 17, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2010 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 22230693 ↗
  • InjuryDec 13, 2024Fracture; Fracture

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2011 IN FDI 45. ON (B)(6) 2024, FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20928151 ↗
  • InjuryOct 17, 2024Fracture; Fracture

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2015 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2024, FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20473873 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page