Skip to content

STRAUMANN DENTAL IMPLANT SYSTEM SLActive Titanium TL (REF 033.651S)Recalls & reported problems

Institut Straumann AG · Standard Plus Implant D 4.8mm, WN, SLActive® 8mm, Ti · Class 2 · Implant

All models of STRAUMANN DENTAL IMPLANT SYSTEM (128)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This Straumann Standard Plus SLActive implant is a screw placed in the jawbone to hold a replacement tooth. Of its 1,746 reports, all filed as injuries, most describe the implant losing its bond with the bone. Reports also mention scar-like tissue, pain, infection and tissue damage. There are no deaths reported, and no recalls name this device.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
1,747
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1,747
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1,747 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630031716378), received between Sep 9, 2019 and Sep 14, 2026 — classified as 1,747 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (1,592 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 21 reportsDec 2023: 21 reportsJan 2024: 12 reportsFeb 2024: 11 reportsMar 2024: 16 reportsApr 2024: 19 reportsMay 2024: 8 reportsJun 2024: 9 reportsJul 2024: 25 reportsAug 2024: 8 reportsSep 2024: 9 reportsOct 2024: 10 reportsNov 2024: 18 reportsDec 2024: 6 reportsJan 2025: 5 reportsFeb 2025: 12 reportsMar 2025: 11 reportsApr 2025: 5 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 32 reportsJul 2025: 10 reportsAug 2025: 5 reportsSep 2025: 6 reportsOct 2025: 11 reportsNov 2025: 5 reportsDec 2025: 17 reportsJan 2026: 8 reportsFeb 2026: 7 reportsMar 2026: 10 reportsApr 2026: 7 reportsMay 2026: 8 reportsJun 2026: 12 reportsJul 2026: 7 reportsAug 2026: 7 reportsSep 2026: 2 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports20242025202632
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loss of Osseointegration1,592
  • Failure to Osseointegrate180
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem8
  • Fracture4
  • Unintended Movement3
  • Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure2

Patient problems

  • Fibrosis640
  • Pain503
  • Unspecified Infection458
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions436
  • Tissue Damage377
  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding168
  • Inflammation149
  • Swelling/ Edema56

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 1,747 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 14, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50760963 ↗
  • InjurySep 14, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50759032 ↗
  • InjuryAug 24, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 50416737 ↗
  • InjuryAug 24, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 50416736 ↗
  • InjuryAug 24, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2012 in ADA 15. Details of surgery: Sinus augmentation. On (b)(6) 2026, loss of osseointegration was verified. Patient presented with bone type IV. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 50414407 ↗
  • InjuryAug 24, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (B)(6) 2012 in ADA 15. Details of surgery: Sinus augmentation. On (B)(6) 2026, loss of osseointegration was verified. Patient presented with bone type IV. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 50413105 ↗
  • InjuryAug 17, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2012 in FDI 46. On (b)(6) 2026, loss of osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 50282156 ↗
  • InjuryAug 10, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted on (b)(6)2012 in ADA 14. On (b)(6)2026, loss of osseointegration was verified. Patient presented with bone type III. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Infection and Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50198759 ↗
  • InjuryAug 10, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted 2012 (b)(6) in ADA 14. On 2026 (b)(6), loss of osseointegration was verified. Patient presented with bone type III. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Infection and Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50197236 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted 2013-(b)(6) in FDI 46. On 2026-(b)(6), loss of osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. There were no patient operative or post-operative complications reported.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50040959 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2013 in FDI 26. On (b)(6) 2026, loss of osseointegration was verified. Patient presented with bone type III. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 50023564 ↗
  • InjuryJul 9, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2020 IN ADA 2. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III AND PREVIOUS BONE AUGMENTATION. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25767664 ↗
  • InjuryJul 9, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2020 IN ADA 2. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III AND PREVIOUS BONE AUGMENTATION. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25766765 ↗
  • InjuryJul 6, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2013 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 25721495 ↗
  • InjuryJul 3, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2013 IN ADA 26. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25705575 ↗
  • InjuryJul 2, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN FDI 15. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain

    MAUDE report 25694559 ↗
  • InjuryJun 29, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2009 IN ADA 18. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS, BLEEDING AND ABSCESS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Abscess; Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 25656670 ↗
  • InjuryJun 29, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2011 IN FDI 47. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION, PAIN AND INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Inflammation; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 25655626 ↗
  • InjuryJun 29, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2009 IN ADA 18. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS, BLEEDING AND ABSCESS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Abscess; Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 25654974 ↗
  • InjuryJun 25, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2010 IN FDI 46. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25627273 ↗
  • InjuryJun 25, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2010 IN FDI 47. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25626589 ↗
  • InjuryJun 22, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2008 IN FDI 36. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain

    MAUDE report 25582551 ↗
  • InjuryJun 15, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2010 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25508952 ↗
  • InjuryJun 15, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2017 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25507837 ↗
  • InjuryJun 8, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2012 IN FDI 37. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Inflammation; Pain

    MAUDE report 25433399 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page