Skip to content

Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid TL (REF 043.258S)Recalls & reported problems

Institut Straumann AG · Standard Implant, D 3.3mm RN, SLA® 14mm, Roxolid®, Loxim™ · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Straumann Dental Implant System Roxolid SLA Impl. (80)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This Straumann Roxolid SLA dental implant is a root-form screw implant used to anchor a replacement tooth in the jaw. The 49 reports mostly describe implants that fail to bond with the surrounding bone, or that later lose that bond, along with some fractures; patients are noted with tissue damage, scarring, infection, pain and inflammation. There are 49 reports, no deaths and 49 injuries, with 5 reports in the last 12 months. No recalls name this device.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
49
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
49
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 49 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630031718952), received between Sep 12, 2019 and Apr 9, 2026 — classified as 49 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (22 reports).

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K150938); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 2 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 2 reportsApr 2026: 3 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520263
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate22
  • Loss of Osseointegration20
  • Fracture6
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions21
  • Tissue Damage11
  • Fibrosis10
  • Unspecified Infection6
  • Inflammation4
  • Pain4
  • Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction2
  • Failure of Implant1

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 49 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 9, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24833737 ↗
  • InjuryApr 9, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24833727 ↗
  • InjuryApr 9, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2026 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24833704 ↗
  • InjuryMar 23, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2016 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24668706 ↗
  • InjuryMar 23, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2016 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24666250 ↗
  • InjuryOct 27, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN FDI 11. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED. ON (B)(6) 202, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23395971 ↗
  • InjuryAug 11, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2022 IN FDI 14. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 22775509 ↗
  • InjuryAug 11, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN FDI 14. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 22774902 ↗
  • InjuryJul 28, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22633822 ↗
  • InjuryNov 22, 2024Fracture; Fracture

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2014 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2024, FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20760933 ↗
  • InjuryMay 10, 2024Fracture; Fracture

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2016 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2024, FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19290452 ↗
  • InjuryApr 2, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2023 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2024, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY AND HYPERSENSITIVITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction

    MAUDE report 19025778 ↗
  • InjuryOct 26, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2007 IN FDI 15. ON (B)(6) 2023, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS, PAIN AND BLEEDING. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 18014245 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2004 IN FDI 24. ON (B)(6) 2023, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY AND INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Inflammation

    MAUDE report 17407453 ↗
  • InjuryJul 19, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS, THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2015 IN FDI 18. ON (B)(6) 2023, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17352966 ↗
  • InjuryApr 28, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2023 IN FDI 13. ON (B)(6) 2023 NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: HYPERSENSITIVITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction

    MAUDE report 16838211 ↗
  • InjuryApr 24, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2023 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2023, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 16801136 ↗
  • InjuryJan 3, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2021 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2022, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16089447 ↗
  • InjuryJan 3, 2023Fracture; Fracture

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2015 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2022, FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT WAS VERIFIED. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16089415 ↗
  • InjuryJan 3, 2023Fracture; Fracture

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2015 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2022, FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16089354 ↗
  • InjuryJan 3, 2023Fracture; Fracture

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2015 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2022, FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16088762 ↗
  • InjuryDec 19, 2022Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2020 IN FDI 24. ON (B)(6) 2022, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16008190 ↗
  • InjurySep 24, 2022Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6)2021 IN FDI 32. ON (B)(6) 2022, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH FAIR ORAL HYGIENE AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN, MOBILITY AND SWELLING. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain; Swelling/ Edema

    MAUDE report 15477567 ↗
  • InjuryJul 18, 2022Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2015 IN FDI 44. ON (B)(6) 2022, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 15045499 ↗
  • InjuryMay 27, 2022Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2013 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2022, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14524767 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K150938. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2534-2016 · Jul 14, 2016 · Terminated
    Straumann Bone Level Implant, 4.1mm RC, SLA 10mm, TiZr, NTP Article Number: 021.4510
  • Z-2535-2016 · Jul 14, 2016 · Terminated
    Straumann Bone Level Implant, 4.1mm RC, SLA 12mm, TiZr, NTP Article Number: 021.4512

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page