Skip to content

Small Diameter Implant System SLA Roxolid BL (REF 021.0112)Recalls & reported problems

Institut Straumann AG · Bone Level Tapered Implant, Ø2.9mm SC, SLA® 12mm, Roxolid®, Loxim™ · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Small Diameter Implant System (5)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This Straumann Small Diameter SLA dental implant has 769 FDA reports, all of them injury reports, and no deaths. Most reports describe the implant failing to bond with the jawbone or losing that bond, and many mention scar tissue, pain or infection. There are no recalls naming this device.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
769
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
769
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 769 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630031728050), received between Mar 1, 2018 and Sep 28, 2026 — classified as 769 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (623 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 8 reportsDec 2023: 13 reportsJan 2024: 5 reportsFeb 2024: 4 reportsMar 2024: 7 reportsApr 2024: 19 reportsMay 2024: 12 reportsJun 2024: 9 reportsJul 2024: 13 reportsAug 2024: 8 reportsSep 2024: 14 reportsOct 2024: 24 reportsNov 2024: 17 reportsDec 2024: 15 reportsJan 2025: 4 reportsFeb 2025: 6 reportsMar 2025: 9 reportsApr 2025: 7 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 29 reportsJul 2025: 9 reportsAug 2025: 12 reportsSep 2025: 8 reportsOct 2025: 11 reportsNov 2025: 17 reportsDec 2025: 16 reportsJan 2026: 11 reportsFeb 2026: 9 reportsMar 2026: 20 reportsApr 2026: 20 reportsMay 2026: 14 reportsJun 2026: 12 reportsJul 2026: 11 reportsAug 2026: 7 reportsSep 2026: 5 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports20242025202629
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate623
  • Loss of Osseointegration128
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem11
  • Difficult to Insert4
  • Fracture2
  • Separation Failure2
  • Difficult to Remove1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions356
  • Fibrosis244
  • Pain148
  • Unspecified Infection104
  • Tissue Damage44
  • Inflammation41
  • Swelling/ Edema38
  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding37

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 769 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 28, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 50921907 ↗
  • InjurySep 28, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain

    MAUDE report 50919570 ↗
  • InjurySep 14, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50759351 ↗
  • InjurySep 11, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 50739101 ↗
  • InjurySep 7, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50654568 ↗
  • InjuryAug 24, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50415601 ↗
  • InjuryAug 17, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2026 in the patient's mouth. On (b)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. There were no reported patient injuries or complications.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50284230 ↗
  • InjuryAug 17, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2026 in the patient's mouth. On (b)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. There were no reported patient injuries or complications.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50284229 ↗
  • InjuryAug 10, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2026 in the patient's mouth. On (b)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. There were no reported patient injuries or complications.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50199591 ↗
  • InjuryAug 10, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (B)(6) 2026 in the patient's mouth. On (B)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. There were no reported patient injuries or complications.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50199358 ↗
  • InjuryAug 3, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50119620 ↗
  • InjuryAug 3, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2026 in the patient's mouth. On (b)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. Patient presented with poor oral hygiene. No product was returned to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Peri-implantitis, Pain, Increased Sensitivity and Inflammation. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Hyperresponsive to stimuli; Inflammation; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50119523 ↗
  • InjuryJul 30, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted 2025(b)(6) in FDI 12. On 2026(b)(6) loss of osseointegration was verified. Patient presented with bone type III. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Infection, Peri-implantitis, Pain and Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50088772 ↗
  • InjuryJul 30, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2026 in the patient's mouth. On (b)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. There were no reported patient injuries or complications.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50088491 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (B)(6) 2026 in the patient's mouth. Details of surgery: Primary stability not achieved and Implant surface not completely covered with bone. On (B)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 50043527 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2026 in FDI 12. On (b)(6) 2026, loss of osseointegration was verified. No product was returned to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 50040501 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2026 in FDI 22. On (b)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. No product was returned to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Inflammation. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Inflammation

    MAUDE report 50040464 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2026 in FDI 12. On (b)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. No product was returned to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Inflammation. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Inflammation

    MAUDE report 50040448 ↗
  • InjuryJul 13, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 25799702 ↗
  • InjuryJul 9, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2026 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25767327 ↗
  • InjuryJul 6, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN FDI 41. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN, SWELLING, HYPERSENSITIVITY, ABSCESS AND INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Abscess; Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction; Inflammation; Pain; Swelling/ Edema

    MAUDE report 25721141 ↗
  • InjuryJul 3, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED AND IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN, MOBILITY AND INCREASED SENSITIVITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Hyperresponsive to stimuli; Pain

    MAUDE report 25706162 ↗
  • InjuryJul 3, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2026 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25705947 ↗
  • InjuryJun 29, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25657135 ↗
  • InjuryJun 29, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN FDI 31. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain

    MAUDE report 25655489 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page