Straumann Bone Level Tapered Implant SLActive Roxolid BL (REF 021.7310G)Recalls & reported problems
Institut Straumann AG · Bone Level Tapered Implant, Ø 4.8mm RC, SLActive® 10mm, Roxolid®, guided · Class 2 · Implant
All models of STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT (39)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Straumann Bone Level dental implant is placed in the jawbone to hold a replacement tooth. All 214 reports are injuries, with no deaths. Most reports describe the implant failing to fuse with the bone or losing that bond, and some describe failure during insertion. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 212
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 212
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 212 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630031730411), received between Sep 9, 2019 and Aug 24, 2026 — classified as 212 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (133 reports).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K140878); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Osseointegrate133
- Loss of Osseointegration57
- Separation Failure11
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem9
- Difficult to Insert2
- Difficult to Remove2
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions86
- Fibrosis60
- Pain42
- Tissue Damage30
- Unspecified Infection25
- Inflammation18
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding17
- Abscess12
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 212 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryAug 24, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
Patient problems: Pain; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 50415630 ↗InjuryAug 24, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6)2017 in FDI 36. On (b)(6)2026, loss of osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.
Patient problems: Fibrosis
MAUDE report 50415013 ↗InjuryAug 24, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
Patient problems: Pain; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 50413427 ↗InjuryJun 25, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN FDI 43. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25625339 ↗InjuryJun 12, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THAT THE DAY THE IMPLANT WAS PLACED IN ADA 30, FAILURE OCCURRED UPON INSERTION. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED, IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE, RIDGE AUGMENTATION AND IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25489662 ↗InjuryJun 12, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THAT THE DAY THE IMPLANT WAS PLACED IN ADA 30, FAILURE OCCURRED UPON INSERTION. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED, IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE, RIDGE AUGMENTATION AND IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25489197 ↗InjuryJun 3, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN ADA 6. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25379350 ↗InjuryJun 3, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25378772 ↗InjuryJun 3, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN ADA 6. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25377626 ↗InjuryMay 15, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2022 IN FDI 26. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS, PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 25188377 ↗InjuryMay 6, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2023 IN ADA 5. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25099835 ↗InjuryMay 6, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2023 IN ADA 5. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25097287 ↗InjuryApr 24, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN ADA 19. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis
MAUDE report 24985208 ↗InjuryMar 6, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24534512 ↗InjuryJan 12, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24043176 ↗InjuryJan 12, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. DETAILS OF SURGERY: SINUS AUGMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24042522 ↗InjuryJan 12, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN ADA 24. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BRUXISM. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFLAMMATION AND NUMBNESS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Inflammation; Numbness
MAUDE report 24041906 ↗InjuryJan 12, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24041134 ↗InjuryNov 17, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23571738 ↗InjuryOct 24, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2018 IN FDI 36. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BRUXISM. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain
MAUDE report 23382103 ↗InjuryAug 25, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN FDI 15. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 22886675 ↗InjuryAug 25, 2025Separation Failure; Separation Failure
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THAT THE DAY THE IMPLANT WAS PLACED IN ADA 30, FAILURE OCCURRED UPON INSERTION. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22886649 ↗InjuryAug 25, 2025Separation Failure; Separation Failure
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THAT THE DAY THE IMPLANT WAS PLACED IN ADA 30, FAILURE OCCURRED UPON INSERTION. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22885696 ↗InjuryJul 4, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22404264 ↗InjuryJun 18, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2022 IN ADA 30. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22259967 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K140878. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2935-2026 · Jul 16, 2026 · Open, ClassifiedStraumann Bone Level Tapered (BLT) Implant, D 4.1mm RC, SLActive 14mm, Roxolid, Loxim (Article 021.5314); implant, endosseous, root-form
- Z-0117-2015 · Sep 19, 2014 · TerminatedStraumann Bone Level Tapered Implant 04.1 mm RC, SLActive 8mm, Roxolid, Loxim Article Number: 021 .5308 Dental implants are intended for surgical placement in maxillary and/or man
Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page