Skip to content

Straumann TLX Implant System SLA Roxolid TL (REF 035.2506S)Recalls & reported problems

Institut Straumann AG · TLX SP Implant, Ø 4.5mm RT, SLA® 6mm, Roxolid® · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Straumann TLX Implant System (132)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This Straumann TLX dental implant is a small screw-shaped root-form implant used to anchor a tooth replacement in the jaw. The 71 reports mostly describe the implant failing to bond with the surrounding bone, or losing that bond later, with patients reporting pain, bleeding, swelling, infection, and scar tissue around the implant site. All 71 reports involved injuries, and no deaths were reported. No recalls name this device.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
74
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
74
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 74 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630031742476), received between Feb 13, 2023 and Sep 14, 2026 — classified as 74 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (60 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 2 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 2 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 3 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 2 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 4 reportsDec 2024: 3 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 4 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 4 reportsJul 2025: 4 reportsAug 2025: 6 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 3 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 4 reportsFeb 2026: 2 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 3 reportsAug 2026: 6 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520266
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate60
  • Loss of Osseointegration9
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Difficult to Insert2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions31
  • Fibrosis26
  • Pain23
  • Unspecified Infection9
  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding6
  • Swelling/ Edema5
  • Inflammation4
  • Abscess2

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 74 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 14, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain

    MAUDE report 50759186 ↗
  • InjuryAug 24, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain

    MAUDE report 50414288 ↗
  • InjuryAug 24, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain

    MAUDE report 50414284 ↗
  • InjuryAug 24, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: Pain; Swelling/ Edema

    MAUDE report 50414282 ↗
  • InjuryAug 17, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2025 in the patient's mouth. Details of surgery: Primary stability not achieved and Implant surface not completely covered with bone. On (b)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. No product was returned to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Infection and Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50282410 ↗
  • InjuryAug 17, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2023 in the patient's mouth. On (b)(6) 2026, loss of osseointegration was verified. No product was returned to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Peri-implantitis, Bleeding and Increased Sensitivity. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Hyperresponsive to stimuli; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50282269 ↗
  • InjuryAug 14, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50258769 ↗
  • InjuryJul 31, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2026 in ADA 14. Details of surgery: Primary stability not achieved and Implant surface not completely covered with bone. On (b)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 50102915 ↗
  • InjuryJul 31, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2026 in ADA 14. Details of surgery: Primary stability not achieved and Implant surface not completely covered with bone. On (b)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 50102217 ↗
  • InjuryJul 13, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN FDI 17. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY AND BLEEDING. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding

    MAUDE report 25802893 ↗
  • InjuryJun 15, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25509176 ↗
  • InjuryMay 6, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN FDI 45. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 25100747 ↗
  • InjuryApr 2, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN FDI 16. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain

    MAUDE report 24768610 ↗
  • InjuryMar 6, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN FDI 34. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE AND RIDGE AUGMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 24535342 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 23, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN FDI 26. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE IV AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 24418577 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 17, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24368093 ↗
  • InjuryJan 26, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2025 IN FDI 16. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE AND RIDGE AUGMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: FISTULA AND INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fistula; Inflammation

    MAUDE report 24182143 ↗
  • InjuryJan 22, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THAT THE DAY THE IMPLANT WAS PLACED IN ADA 14, FAILURE OCCURRED UPON INSERTION. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED AND RIDGE AUGMENTATION. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 24150625 ↗
  • InjuryJan 22, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN FDI 36. DETAILS OF SURGERY: RIDGE AUGMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 24150615 ↗
  • InjuryJan 5, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN ADA 16. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 23962659 ↗
  • InjuryDec 18, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23841410 ↗
  • InjuryNov 27, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23667046 ↗
  • InjuryNov 11, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III, FAIR ORAL HYGIENE AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain

    MAUDE report 23525304 ↗
  • InjuryNov 7, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 23500060 ↗
  • InjuryAug 29, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN FDI 28. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22925247 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page