Straumann BLX Line Extension - Implants, SRAs And Anatomic Abutments SLA Roxolid BL (REF 061.4516)Recalls & reported problems
Institut Straumann AG · BLX Implant, Ø 3.75mm RB, SLA® 16mm, Roxolid® · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Straumann BLX implant is an endosseous dental implant. Reports describe failure to osseointegrate or loss of integration, sometimes with pain, mobility, or infection. There are 81 adverse event reports, no deaths, and 81 injuries. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 82
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 82
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 82 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630031743480), received between Aug 2, 2021 and Aug 24, 2026 — classified as 82 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (63 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Osseointegrate63
- Loss of Osseointegration10
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem8
- Difficult to Insert1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions47
- Fibrosis23
- Pain17
- Unspecified Infection13
- Inflammation2
- Swelling/ Edema2
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 82 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryAug 24, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
The clinician reports that the day the implant was placed in the patient's mouth, failure occurred upon insertion. Details of surgery: Primary stability not achieved. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. There were no reported patient injuries or complications.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50415376 ↗InjuryJul 27, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
The clinician reports that the day the implant was placed in ADA 10, failure occurred upon insertion. Details of surgery: Primary stability not achieved and Immediate extraction site. Patient presented with bone type III and inadequate bone quality/quantity. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.
Patient problems: Fibrosis
MAUDE report 50040983 ↗InjuryJun 22, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25581605 ↗InjuryJun 22, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25581534 ↗InjuryJun 22, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25581396 ↗InjuryJun 15, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN FDI 12. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE IV AND POOR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain
MAUDE report 25508020 ↗InjuryMay 22, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN FDI 12. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain
MAUDE report 25258652 ↗InjuryApr 27, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THAT THE DAY THE IMPLANT WAS PLACED IN FDI 11, FAILURE OCCURRED UPON INSERTION. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED AND IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25005458 ↗InjuryApr 24, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN ADA 23. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION, PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 24986094 ↗InjuryApr 24, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN ADA 26. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION, PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 24986090 ↗InjuryApr 24, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN ADA 26. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION, PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 24985486 ↗InjuryApr 24, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN ADA 23. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION, PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 24985325 ↗InjuryApr 21, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS AND PAIN. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Pain; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 24943074 ↗InjuryApr 14, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24875773 ↗InjuryApr 14, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24875755 ↗InjuryApr 11, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH POOR ORAL HYGIENE. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN, MOBILITY AND BLEEDING. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis; Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Pain
MAUDE report 24846623 ↗InjuryMar 30, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN ADA 15. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE IV. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24719010 ↗InjuryMar 30, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN ADA 15. ON (B)(6) 2026, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE IV. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24716803 ↗InjuryMar 23, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6)2025 IN FDI 14. ON (B)(6)2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24666287 ↗InjuryMar 2, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED AND IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24488211 ↗InjuryJan 5, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN ADA 7. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED AND IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23963458 ↗InjuryJan 5, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 N ADA 7. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED AND IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE. ON (B)(6) 2025 , NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23961619 ↗InjuryDec 23, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis; Pain
MAUDE report 23876995 ↗InjuryDec 5, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN ADA 23. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis
MAUDE report 23731341 ↗InjuryDec 5, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN ADA 23. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis
MAUDE report 23730731 ↗
Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page