Straumann BLX Implant System SLActive Roxolid BL (REF 061.7318)Recalls & reported problems
Institut Straumann AG · BLX Implant, Ø 5.0mm WB, SLActive® 18mm, Roxolid® · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Straumann BLX Implant System (60)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Straumann BLX dental implant is a screw-shaped root-form implant used to replace missing teeth. The 32 reports mostly describe implants that failed to fuse with the surrounding bone, or that lost that fusion later, leaving the implant mobile; patients also mention pain, inflammation, infection, scarring tissue and tissue damage. All 32 reports involve injuries, with no deaths reported. No recalls name this device. In the last 12 months there were 10 reports, compared with 4 in the previous 12 months.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 33
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 33
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 33 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630031743770), received between Jul 3, 2020 and Sep 10, 2026 — classified as 33 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (21 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Osseointegrate21
- Loss of Osseointegration8
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions15
- Fibrosis11
- Pain5
- Unspecified Infection3
- Inflammation2
- Tissue Damage2
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 33 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 10, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50719058 ↗InjuryAug 10, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
The clinician reports the implant was inserted 2023 (b)(6) in FDI 45. On 2026 (b)(6), loss of osseointegration was verified. Patient presented with bone type IV. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.
Patient problems: Fibrosis
MAUDE report 50197771 ↗InjuryAug 10, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2023 in FDI 35. On (b)(6) 2026, loss of osseointegration was verified. Patient presented with bone type IV. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.
Patient problems: Fibrosis
MAUDE report 50197743 ↗InjuryJul 27, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
The clinician reports the implant was inserted 2024-(b)(6) in the patient's mouth. On 2026-(b)(6), loss of osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. There were no patient operative or post-operative complications reported.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50042784 ↗InjuryJul 17, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN ADA 19. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED AND IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis
MAUDE report 25859246 ↗InjuryJul 17, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN ADA 19. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED AND IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis
MAUDE report 25858558 ↗InjuryJun 15, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25509066 ↗InjuryJun 15, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25508916 ↗InjuryJan 22, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN ADA 12. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE IV AND FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24150667 ↗InjuryJan 22, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN ADA 12. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE IV AND FAIR ORAL HYGIENE. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24149497 ↗InjuryNov 10, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN FDI 26. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis
MAUDE report 23517390 ↗InjuryAug 28, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22915355 ↗InjuryAug 28, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22915266 ↗InjuryJul 10, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 22471708 ↗InjuryJun 17, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN FDI 17. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS AND PAIN. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Pain; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 22227004 ↗InjuryJun 24, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN FDI 15. ON (B)(6) 2024, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis
MAUDE report 19600414 ↗InjuryJun 24, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN FDI 25. ON (B)(6) 2024 , NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis
MAUDE report 19598259 ↗InjuryApr 8, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2023 IN ADA 6. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE AND IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2023, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN, MOBILITY AND INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis; Inflammation; Pain
MAUDE report 19061990 ↗InjuryApr 5, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2023 IN ADA 6. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE AND IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2023, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN, MOBILITY AND INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis; Inflammation; Pain
MAUDE report 19052782 ↗InjuryFeb 19, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2023 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2023, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18733546 ↗InjuryDec 27, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2023 IN FDI 26. ON (B)(6) 2023, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18405389 ↗InjuryJun 26, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2022 IN ADA 25. ON (B)(6) 2023, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis
MAUDE report 17205477 ↗InjuryOct 3, 2022Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2022 IN FDI 13. ON (B)(6) 2022, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis
MAUDE report 15531322 ↗InjuryJun 9, 2022Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2022 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. DETAILS OF SURGERY: RIDGE AUGMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2022, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 14646491 ↗InjuryFeb 14, 2022Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2021 IN ADA 11. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE AND RIDGE AUGMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2021, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13526913 ↗
Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page