Straumann TLX Implant System SLActive Roxolid TL (REF 035.1706S)Recalls & reported problems
Institut Straumann AG · TLX S Implant, Ø 5.5mm WT, SLActive® 6mm, Roxolid® · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Straumann TLX Implant System (132)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Straumann TLX dental implant is a root-form screw placed into the jawbone to support a replacement tooth. The 27 reports mostly describe the implant failing to fuse with the surrounding bone, or losing that fusion months to years later, with some cases also mentioning pain, swelling, inflammation around the implant, and one report noting difficulty placing it. All 27 reports are injuries; there are no deaths. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 29
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 29
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 29 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630031752017), received between Dec 13, 2021 and Sep 14, 2026 — classified as 29 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (18 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Osseointegrate18
- Loss of Osseointegration8
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Difficult to Insert1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions14
- Fibrosis11
- Pain5
- Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction1
- Inflammation1
- Sinus Perforation1
- Swelling/ Edema1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 29 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 14, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50759874 ↗InjurySep 10, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 50720225 ↗InjuryAug 10, 2026Loss of Osseointegration
The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2024 in FDI 36. On (b)(6) 2026, loss of osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. There were no patient operative or post-operative complications reported.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50198253 ↗InjuryApr 13, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN ADA 14. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24864368 ↗InjuryApr 13, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN ADA 14. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24861740 ↗InjuryMar 23, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN FDI 17. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24666585 ↗InjuryDec 15, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23806622 ↗InjuryJun 24, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN FDI 47. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS AND MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 22314970 ↗InjuryJun 18, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN ADA 2. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH PREVIOUS BONE AUGMENTATION. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 22276346 ↗InjuryJun 18, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN ADA 2. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE. ON (B)(6) 2025, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH PREVIOUS BONE AUGMENTATION. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 22275548 ↗InjuryJun 18, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025 NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22273852 ↗InjuryJun 18, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22273758 ↗InjuryJun 17, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN ADA 30. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis
MAUDE report 22224580 ↗InjuryJun 17, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN ADA 30. ON (B)(6) 2025, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis
MAUDE report 22222904 ↗InjuryJan 13, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2024, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PAIN, SWELLING AND INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Inflammation; Pain; Swelling/ Edema
MAUDE report 21141800 ↗InjuryDec 23, 2024Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2022 IN FDI 48. ON (B)(6) 2024, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21003502 ↗InjuryOct 31, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024 IN FDI 17. DETAILS OF SURGERY: IMPLANT SURFACE NOT COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BONE. ON (B)(6) 2024, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis
MAUDE report 20580780 ↗InjuryAug 15, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2024, IN FDI 16. ON (B)(6) 2024, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE IV. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis
MAUDE report 19993363 ↗InjuryJun 10, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2023 IN ADA 14. DETAILS OF SURGERY: SINUS AUGMENTATION AND IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2023, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19500713 ↗InjuryJun 10, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2023 IN ADA 14. DETAILS OF SURGERY: SINUS AUGMENTATION AND IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SITE. ON (B)(6) 2023, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19500244 ↗InjuryJun 3, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THAT THE DAY THE IMPLANT WAS PLACED IN FDI 46, FAILURE OCCURRED UPON INSERTION. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis
MAUDE report 19451197 ↗InjuryDec 5, 2022Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2022 IN FDI 16. ON (B)(6) 2022, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15917688 ↗InjuryNov 7, 2022Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THAT THE DAY THE IMPLANT WAS PLACED IN FDI 16, FAILURE OCCURRED UPON INSERTION. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED AND SINUS PERFORATION. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE IV AND INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis; Sinus Perforation
MAUDE report 15745912 ↗InjurySep 12, 2022Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2022 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED. ON (B)(6) 2022, LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT OPERATIVE OR POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15404136 ↗InjuryJul 21, 2022Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2022 IN FDI 26. ON (B)(6) 2022, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE IV. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY AND HYPERSENSITIVITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Fibrosis; Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction
MAUDE report 15077112 ↗
Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page