Skip to content

Straumann® BLC and TLC Implants SLA Roxolid TL (REF 035.6310S)Recalls & reported problems

Institut Straumann AG · TLC SP Implant, Ø 3.75mm RT, SLA® 10mm, Roxolid® · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Straumann BLC and TLC Implants (153)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This is a Straumann BLC/TLC dental implant, a screw-shaped titanium post used as a root replacement in the jaw. The 47 reports mostly describe the implant failing to fuse with the surrounding bone, with some inflammation, fibrosis and infection noted, and one report of difficulty placing it. There are no deaths and 47 injuries. No recalls name this device, and all 47 reports came in the past 12 months, with none in the year before.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
51
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
51
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 51 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630031765178), received between Dec 29, 2025 and Sep 28, 2026 — classified as 51 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (46 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 12 reportsApr 2026: 7 reportsMay 2026: 2 reportsJun 2026: 9 reportsJul 2026: 9 reportsAug 2026: 5 reportsSep 2026: 5 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports20242025202612
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate46
  • Loss of Osseointegration3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Difficult to Insert1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions35
  • Fibrosis7
  • Inflammation5
  • Unspecified Infection4
  • Hyperresponsive to stimuli3
  • Pain3
  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding2

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 51 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 28, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 50921844 ↗
  • InjurySep 28, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 50921807 ↗
  • InjurySep 28, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50921753 ↗
  • InjurySep 14, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50760313 ↗
  • InjurySep 10, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50718972 ↗
  • InjuryAug 24, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2026 in FDI 46. On (b)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. Patient presented with bone type IV and inadequate bone quality/quantity. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 50414894 ↗
  • InjuryAug 14, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 50259612 ↗
  • InjuryAug 7, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2026 in the patient's mouth. On (b)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. There were no reported patient injuries or complications.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50179098 ↗
  • InjuryAug 7, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6)2026 in the patient's mouth. On (b)(6)2026, non-osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. There were no reported patient injuries or complications.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50179038 ↗
  • InjuryAug 3, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50119931 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (B)(6) 2026 in the patient's mouth. On (B)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. Patient presented with bone type III. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. There were no reported patient injuries or complications.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50040599 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6)2026 in the patient's mouth. On (b)(6)2026, non-osseointegration was verified. No product was returned to the manufacturer. There were no reported patient injuries or complications.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50010209 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2026 in the patient's mouth. On (b)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. No product was returned to the manufacturer. There were no reported patient injuries or complications.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50010199 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2026 in the patient's mouth. On (b)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. No product was returned to the manufacturer. There were no reported patient injuries or complications.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50010169 ↗
  • InjuryJul 13, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25800414 ↗
  • InjuryJul 13, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2026 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25800346 ↗
  • InjuryJul 9, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25767424 ↗
  • InjuryJul 6, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN FDI 46. ON (B)(6) 2026 NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INCREASED SENSITIVITY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Hyperresponsive to stimuli

    MAUDE report 25721455 ↗
  • InjuryJul 6, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN FDI 26. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25720900 ↗
  • InjuryJun 29, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN FDI 13. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Inflammation

    MAUDE report 25655813 ↗
  • InjuryJun 29, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN FDI 23. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BONE TYPE III. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: MOBILITY AND INFLAMMATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Inflammation

    MAUDE report 25655811 ↗
  • InjuryJun 22, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25583536 ↗
  • InjuryJun 19, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025 IN FDI 12. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25564565 ↗
  • InjuryJun 15, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 25509169 ↗
  • InjuryJun 15, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. DETAILS OF SURGERY: PRIMARY STABILITY NOT ACHIEVED. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25508067 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page