Skip to content

Straumann® BLC and TLC Implants SLA Roxolid BL (REF 035.9308S)Recalls & reported problems

Institut Straumann AG · BLC Implant, Ø 4.0mm RB, SLActive 8mm, Roxolid · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Straumann BLC and TLC Implants (153)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This Straumann BLC/TLC dental implant is a screw-shaped root implant used to anchor a tooth replacement. The 36 reports filed in the past 12 months all describe the implant failing to bond with the surrounding bone, or losing that bond after placement, with patients reporting mobility, pain, swelling, infection and scar tissue at the site. No deaths were reported. No recalls name this device.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
41
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
41
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 41 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630031780072), received between Feb 23, 2026 and Sep 28, 2026 — classified as 41 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (34 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 4 reportsApr 2026: 2 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 9 reportsJul 2026: 5 reportsAug 2026: 12 reportsSep 2026: 7 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports20242025202612
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate34
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
  • Loss of Osseointegration3

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions17
  • Fibrosis15
  • Unspecified Infection8
  • Pain7
  • Inflammation4
  • Swelling/ Edema2

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 41 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 28, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50920135 ↗
  • InjurySep 28, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6)2026 in ADA 13. On (b)(6)2026, non-osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. There were no reported patient injuries or complications.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50919955 ↗
  • InjurySep 28, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50918571 ↗
  • InjurySep 28, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50918476 ↗
  • InjurySep 11, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50737893 ↗
  • InjurySep 10, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 50719176 ↗
  • InjurySep 10, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 50719175 ↗
  • InjuryAug 27, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2026 in ADA 4. On (b)(6) 2026, loss of osseointegration was verified. Patient presented with bone type III. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 50481407 ↗
  • InjuryAug 27, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (B)(6) 2026 in ADA 4. On (B)(6) 2026, loss of osseointegration was verified. Patient presented with bone type III. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 50480383 ↗
  • InjuryAug 24, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2026 in FDI 45. On (b)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. There were no reported patient injuries or complications.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50415889 ↗
  • InjuryAug 21, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2025 in the patient's mouth. On (b)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. There were no reported patient injuries or complications.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50377407 ↗
  • InjuryAug 17, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2026 in ADA 27. On (b)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 50283945 ↗
  • InjuryAug 17, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted 2026 (b)(6) in ADA 27. On 2026 (b)(6), non-osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Mobility. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis

    MAUDE report 50281388 ↗
  • InjuryAug 10, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2026 in FDI 26. On (b)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. There were no reported patient injuries or complications.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50199176 ↗
  • InjuryAug 10, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2026 in ADA 29. Details of surgery: Implant surface not completely covered with bone. On (B)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Pain and Inflammation. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Inflammation; Pain

    MAUDE report 50198799 ↗
  • InjuryAug 10, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted 2026 (b)(6) in ADA 29. Details of surgery: Implant surface not completely covered with bone. On 2026 (b)(6), non-osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Pain and Inflammation. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Inflammation; Pain

    MAUDE report 50197268 ↗
  • InjuryAug 3, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50120929 ↗
  • InjuryAug 3, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50120291 ↗
  • InjuryAug 3, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2026 in ADA 27. Details of surgery: Implant surface not completely covered with bone. On (b)(6) 2026, non-osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. There were no reported patient injuries or complications.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50118399 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted 2026-(b)(6) in the patient's mouth. On 2026-(b)(6), non-osseointegration was verified. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. There were no reported patient injuries or complications.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50040966 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted 2026(b)(6) in ADA 6. On 2026-(b)(6), non-osseointegration was verified. Patient presented with previous bone augmentation. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Peri-implantitis, Pain, Swelling and Inflammation. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Inflammation; Pain; Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50023012 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician reports the implant was inserted 2026 (b)(6) in ADA 6. On 2026 (b)(6), non-osseointegration was verified. Patient presented with previous bone augmentation. The device was forwarded to the manufacturer. At the event the patient experienced: Peri-implantitis, Pain, Swelling and Inflammation. No further patient complications were reported.

    Patient problems: Inflammation; Pain; Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50022597 ↗
  • InjuryJul 13, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/QUANTITY. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 25801625 ↗
  • InjuryJul 13, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2026 IN FDI 43. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES OR COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25799884 ↗
  • InjuryJun 29, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN REPORTS THE IMPLANT WAS INSERTED (B)(6) 2025, IN THE PATIENT'S MOUTH. ON (B)(6) 2026, NON-OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS VERIFIED. NO PRODUCT WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. AT THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: PERI-IMPLANTITIS. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 25657510 ↗

Other Implant, endosseous, root-form devices

All Implant, endosseous, root-form devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page