Skip to content

Shoulder System 04.01.0152Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Glenoid baseplate Ø24.5x25 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Shoulder System (63)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630040706391), received between Jan 10, 2020 and Mar 16, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available2
  • Break1
  • Malposition of Device1

Patient problems

  • Bone Fracture(s)5
  • No Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 16, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ACROMION FRACTURE DETECTED 5 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY PROCEDURE. NO REVISION SURGERY PLANNED; PHYSIOTHERAPY ONLY.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 24603552 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 26, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AFTER IMPACTING THE GLENOSPHERE ONTO THE BASEPLATE, THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO INSERT THE SCREW, BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. SEVERAL ATTEMPTS, INCLUDING THE USE OF ANOTHER GLENOSPHERE OF THE SAME LOT, ALSO FAILED. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO REPLACE THE BASEPLATE. HOWEVER, DURING ITS REMOVAL, THE GLENOID FRACTURED, NECESSITATING THE IMPLANTATION OF A CTA-TYPE ENDOPROSTHESIS. SUBSEQUENTLY, OUTSIDE THE OPERATIVE FIELD, THE FIT BETWEEN THE GLENOSPHERE AND THE BASEPLATE WAS TESTED AGAIN, BUT EACH TIME THE CENTRAL SCREW WAS TIGHTENED, THE GLENOSPHERE WOULD SLIP OUT OF THE BASEPLATE. DELAY TIME: APPROXIMATELY 30 MINUTES (TOTAL DURATION 1.5 HOURS). NO INFO REGARDING PATIENT`S BONE QUALITY. NO GUIDE WAS USED FORGLENOSPHEREINSERTION.RETENTIVE GLENOSPHERE IMPACTOR (REF 04.01.10.0432) USED.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 24454894 ↗
  • InjuryJul 1, 2022Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    AT ABOUT 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED DUE TO A GLENOID BONE FRACTURE. THE CAUSE OF THIS BONE FRACTURE IS NOT KNOWN. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 14883694 ↗
  • InjurySep 16, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY OF THE GLENOID COMPONENTS DUE TO BONE FRACTURE AND MOBILIZATION, THE PATIENT HAS A POOR BONE QUALITY. PRIMARY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 12480570 ↗
  • InjuryNov 25, 2020Break

    (B)(6) PATIENT OPERATED WITH REVERSE SHOULDER SYSTEM ON (B)(6) 2020. INTRA-OPERATIVELY, THE GLENOID CONSTRUCT WAS UNSTABLE, THE GLENOID BONE FRACTURED AND THE BASEPLATE MOBILIZED COMPLETELY. THE FRACTURE AND THE BASEPLATE WERE CEMENTED IN ORDER TO FIX THE ISSUE. AFTER 3 DAYS, THE BASEPLATE MOBILIZED AGAIN, THE PATIENT WAS THEN REVISED.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 10904260 ↗
  • InjuryJan 10, 2020Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device

    ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 2 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT SHOULDER. HE RECOGNIZED A BASEPLATE MAL POSITIONING, IT WAS TOO HIGH, IT IMPINGED AND CREATED OSSIFICATION. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 9573859 ↗

Other Shoulder Prosthesis, Reverse Configuration devices

All Shoulder Prosthesis, Reverse Configuration devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page