Skip to content

Shoulder System 04.01.0154Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Glenoid baseplate Ø27x15 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Shoulder System (63)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630040706414), received between Apr 10, 2018 and Mar 3, 2026 — classified as 6 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Contamination” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Contamination1
  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1
  • Malposition of Device1
  • Mechanical Problem1

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection3
  • Insufficient Information2
  • Implant Pain1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 3, 2026Mechanical Problem

    THE GLENOSPHERE SCREW COULD NOT BE FULLY INSERTED IN THE BASEPLATE. RESIDUAL BONE AROUND THE BASEPLATE WAS SUSPECTED, AND THE SURROUNDING AREA WAS CLEARED AGAIN, BUT THE SAME ISSUE OCCURRED. WHEN THE SCREW WAS INSERTED WITHOUT THE GLENOSPHERE AS A TEST, THE SCREW AGAIN STOPPED MIDWAY. THE SCREW WAS LEFT AT THE POINT WHERE IT STOPPED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED IMPLANTING THE GLENOSPHERE WITH THE GLENOSPHERE SCREW NOT COMPLETELY SCREWED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24494903 ↗
  • InjuryJul 3, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT 3 YEARS 11 MONTHS, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE BASEPLATE, AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE BASEPLATE, GLENOSPHERE, LINER, AND METAPHYSIS. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 22395931 ↗
  • InjurySep 1, 2023Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 4 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION. THE SURGEON REVISED ALL THE IMPLANTS.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 17669144 ↗
  • InjuryJul 7, 2022Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device

    AT ABOUT 5 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT CAME IN FOR A POST-OP APPOINTMENT AND IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE BASEPLATE POSITION WAS MALALIGNED INFERIORLY. ACCORDING TO THE REVISION SURGEON, THE IMPLANT WAS MALPOSITIONED DURING THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO REVISE THE METAPHYSIS, AND USED COMPETITOR'S BASEPLATE AND GLENOSPHERE TO REVISE INCLINATION/ANGLE OF THE IMPLANT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 14942677 ↗
  • InjuryMar 12, 2021Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    REVISION SURGERY 4 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY FOR BASE PLATE LOOSENING. THE SURGEON REVISED SUCCESSFULLY THE PATIENT SHOULDER REPLACING THE GLENOIDS IMPLANTS AND THE HUMERAL REVERSE HC LINER. THE GLENOSPHERE WAS FOUND COUPLED TO THE BASEPLATE DURING THE REVISION.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 11473640 ↗
  • InjuryNov 20, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY DUE TO AN INFECTION. THE PATHOGEN IS CUTIBACTERIUM ACNES ET STAPHYLOCOQUE EPIDERMIDIS. ALL IMPLANTS WERE REVISED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 9346680 ↗
  • InjuryApr 10, 2018Contamination

    ABOUT 8 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT SHOULDER FOR AN INFECTION. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 7412279 ↗

Other Shoulder Prosthesis, Reverse Configuration devices

All Shoulder Prosthesis, Reverse Configuration devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page