Skip to content

AMIStem-P 01.18.405Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · AMIStem-P Std. #5 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of AMIStem-P (18)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
9
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630040720045), received between May 9, 2019 and May 21, 2026 — classified as 9 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available3
  • Fracture3
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Migration1
  • Osseointegration Problem1

Patient problems

  • Bone Fracture(s)4
  • Joint Disorder2
  • Medical device site infection2
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 21, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED 1 YEAR AND 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO STEM LOOSENING CAUSED BY INFECTION. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 25242298 ↗
  • InjuryMar 30, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    REVISION SURGERY AFTER 1 YEAR AND 2 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY DUE TO PERIPROSTHETIC INFECTION.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 24711035 ↗
  • InjurySep 25, 2024Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ABOUT 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO FEMORAL BONE FRACTURE (FRACTURE AT THE LEVEL OF THE TIP). STEM AND HEAD REVISED. M-VIZION STEM IMPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 20301657 ↗
  • InjuryAug 22, 2024Migration; Migration

    AT ABOUT 10 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED FOLLOWING STEM SUBSIDENCE DUE TO PERIPROSTHETIC BONE FRACTURE DETECTED BY X-RAYS THAT SHOWED A VERTICAL BONE FRACTURE RYME. ALL COMPONENTS REVISED TO M-VIZION. PATIENT'S BONE QUALITY NORMAL.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 20035287 ↗
  • InjuryAug 17, 2021Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    REVISION SURGERY 6 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY FOR STEM LOOSENING. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 12331235 ↗
  • InjuryApr 21, 2021Fracture; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    WHEN THE PATIENT WAS BEING MOVED AFTER THE PRIMARY HIP SURGERY AND WAS GETTING UP FROM A SITTING POSITION, THE PATIENT SUSTAINED A FRACTURE AND SUBSIDED STEM. THE FRACTURE CAUSED THE SUBSIDED STEM. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO REVISE THE STEM, HEAD, AND LINER 4 DAYS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 11700207 ↗
  • InjuryAug 5, 2020Loose or Intermittent Connection; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE PATIENT CAME IN 1YEAR AND 3 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY REPORTING THIGH PAIN WHICH WAS CAUSED BY A LOOSE STEM. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD WITH ANOTHER COMPANY'S PRODUCT AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 10366565 ↗
  • InjuryApr 15, 2020Fracture; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    FEMUR BONE FRACTURE 1 MONTH AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY. THE STEM HAS BEEN REVISED.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 9961386 ↗
  • InjuryMay 9, 2019Fracture; Loose or Intermittent Connection

    ON THE (B)(6) 2019 WE WERE INFORMED OF A REVISION SURGERY PLANNED FOR AND PERFORMED ON THE (B)(6) 2019, 5 MONTHS FORM THE PRIMARY, DUE TO PAIN CAUSED BY A FRACTURED FEMUR AND SUBSIDED STEM. THE PATIENT GETTING OUT OF BED HEARD A POPPING SOUND, SHE ASSUMED IT WAS HER KNEE POPPING BUT IT WAS HER HIP FRACTURING AND THE STEM SUBSIDING (THE PATIENT IS OVERWEIGHT). THE SURGEON REVISED THE CERAMIC HEAD TO EXTEND THE PATIENT'S LEG LENGTH AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE FRACTURE WAS ALREADY HEALED SO THE SURGEON CHOSE TO LEAVE THE STEM IN PLACE.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 8595282 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page