AMIStem-P 01.18.405Recalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · AMIStem-P Std. #5 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of AMIStem-P (18)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 9
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630040720045), received between May 9, 2019 and May 21, 2026 — classified as 9 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available3
- Fracture3
- Loose or Intermittent Connection2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Migration1
- Osseointegration Problem1
Patient problems
- Bone Fracture(s)4
- Joint Disorder2
- Medical device site infection2
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 21, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED 1 YEAR AND 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO STEM LOOSENING CAUSED BY INFECTION. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 25242298 ↗InjuryMar 30, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
REVISION SURGERY AFTER 1 YEAR AND 2 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY DUE TO PERIPROSTHETIC INFECTION.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 24711035 ↗InjurySep 25, 2024Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ABOUT 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO FEMORAL BONE FRACTURE (FRACTURE AT THE LEVEL OF THE TIP). STEM AND HEAD REVISED. M-VIZION STEM IMPLANTED.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 20301657 ↗InjuryAug 22, 2024Migration; Migration
AT ABOUT 10 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED FOLLOWING STEM SUBSIDENCE DUE TO PERIPROSTHETIC BONE FRACTURE DETECTED BY X-RAYS THAT SHOWED A VERTICAL BONE FRACTURE RYME. ALL COMPONENTS REVISED TO M-VIZION. PATIENT'S BONE QUALITY NORMAL.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 20035287 ↗InjuryAug 17, 2021Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
REVISION SURGERY 6 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY FOR STEM LOOSENING. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 12331235 ↗InjuryApr 21, 2021Fracture; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
WHEN THE PATIENT WAS BEING MOVED AFTER THE PRIMARY HIP SURGERY AND WAS GETTING UP FROM A SITTING POSITION, THE PATIENT SUSTAINED A FRACTURE AND SUBSIDED STEM. THE FRACTURE CAUSED THE SUBSIDED STEM. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO REVISE THE STEM, HEAD, AND LINER 4 DAYS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 11700207 ↗InjuryAug 5, 2020Loose or Intermittent Connection; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT CAME IN 1YEAR AND 3 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY REPORTING THIGH PAIN WHICH WAS CAUSED BY A LOOSE STEM. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD WITH ANOTHER COMPANY'S PRODUCT AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 10366565 ↗InjuryApr 15, 2020Fracture; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
FEMUR BONE FRACTURE 1 MONTH AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY. THE STEM HAS BEEN REVISED.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 9961386 ↗InjuryMay 9, 2019Fracture; Loose or Intermittent Connection
ON THE (B)(6) 2019 WE WERE INFORMED OF A REVISION SURGERY PLANNED FOR AND PERFORMED ON THE (B)(6) 2019, 5 MONTHS FORM THE PRIMARY, DUE TO PAIN CAUSED BY A FRACTURED FEMUR AND SUBSIDED STEM. THE PATIENT GETTING OUT OF BED HEARD A POPPING SOUND, SHE ASSUMED IT WAS HER KNEE POPPING BUT IT WAS HER HIP FRACTURING AND THE STEM SUBSIDING (THE PATIENT IS OVERWEIGHT). THE SURGEON REVISED THE CERAMIC HEAD TO EXTEND THE PATIENT'S LEG LENGTH AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE FRACTURE WAS ALREADY HEALED SO THE SURGEON CHOSE TO LEAVE THE STEM IN PLACE.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 8595282 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices
- PINNACLE 1217-25-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED735 reports
- NA 1365-52-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED683 reports
- APEX 1246-03-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED3 deaths613 reports
- PINNACLE 1217-20-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED2 deaths590 reports
- PINNACLE 1217-30-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED1 death484 reports
- NA 1365-53-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED404 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED388 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-32-050Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED386 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page