Skip to content

AMIStem-P 01.18.406Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · AMIStem-P Std. #6 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of AMIStem-P (18)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630040720052), received between Mar 21, 2019 and Nov 5, 2025 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available2
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Device Slipped1
  • Failure to Osseointegrate1
  • Fracture1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration2
  • Aseptic loosening1
  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Joint Disorder1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 5, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    AFTER 1 YEAR AND 4 MONTHS, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH PAIN RELATED TO A LOOSE STEM, AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON DIAGNOSED THE STEM AS BEING “ POTTED, & RDQUO; MEANING IT WAS DISTALLY FIXED BUT LOOSE PROXIMALLY, CREATING A “ WINDSHIELD WIPER” EFFECT. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM USING A COMPETITOR IMPLANT AND ALSO REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening

    MAUDE report 23477170 ↗
  • InjuryApr 24, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    AT ABOUT 6 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD WITH COMPETITOR COMPONENTS AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 21898243 ↗
  • InjuryJul 19, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    HOLD FOR REVIEW (KP) THE PATIENT HAD A PRIMARY HIP SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021. ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A SUBSIDED STEM. THE CAUSE OF THE SUBSIDED STEM WAS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. PRESENTLY, ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 12187272 ↗
  • InjuryDec 2, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN DUE TO A POTTED STEM. THE CAUSE OF THE POTTED STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD ALMOST 7 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 9394959 ↗
  • InjuryNov 6, 2019Device Slipped; Unstable

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED 4 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY DUE TO INSTABILITY DUE TO A SLIGHTLY SUBSIDED STEM. THE SURGEON REVISED THE 28 MM COCR HEAD M WITH A 28 MM COCR HEAD XXL AND REVISED THE VERSAFITCUP DM LINER HC 58/28 WITH A VERSAFITCUP DM LINER HC 58/28. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 9283658 ↗
  • InjuryMar 21, 2019Fracture

    AFTER THE PRIMARY HIP SURGERY WAS COMPLETE, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE FEMUR HAD SUSTAINED AN INTRA-OPERATIVE FRACTURE. THE SURGEON SUSPECTS THE FRACTURE OCCURRED WHEN THE STEM WAS IMPLANTED. THE SURGEON CABLED THE FRACTURE AND REVISED THE STEM FROM A SIZE 6 TO A SIZE 5 AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 8439905 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page