AMIStem-P 01.18.406Recalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · AMIStem-P Std. #6 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of AMIStem-P (18)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 6
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630040720052), received between Mar 21, 2019 and Nov 5, 2025 — classified as 6 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available2
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Device Slipped1
- Failure to Osseointegrate1
- Fracture1
- Loss of Osseointegration1
- Unstable1
Patient problems
- Inadequate Osseointegration2
- Aseptic loosening1
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- Joint Disorder1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 5, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
AFTER 1 YEAR AND 4 MONTHS, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH PAIN RELATED TO A LOOSE STEM, AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON DIAGNOSED THE STEM AS BEING “ POTTED, & RDQUO; MEANING IT WAS DISTALLY FIXED BUT LOOSE PROXIMALLY, CREATING A “ WINDSHIELD WIPER” EFFECT. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM USING A COMPETITOR IMPLANT AND ALSO REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Aseptic loosening
MAUDE report 23477170 ↗InjuryApr 24, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
AT ABOUT 6 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD WITH COMPETITOR COMPONENTS AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 21898243 ↗InjuryJul 19, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
HOLD FOR REVIEW (KP) THE PATIENT HAD A PRIMARY HIP SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021. ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A SUBSIDED STEM. THE CAUSE OF THE SUBSIDED STEM WAS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. PRESENTLY, ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 12187272 ↗InjuryDec 2, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN DUE TO A POTTED STEM. THE CAUSE OF THE POTTED STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD ALMOST 7 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 9394959 ↗InjuryNov 6, 2019Device Slipped; Unstable
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED 4 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY DUE TO INSTABILITY DUE TO A SLIGHTLY SUBSIDED STEM. THE SURGEON REVISED THE 28 MM COCR HEAD M WITH A 28 MM COCR HEAD XXL AND REVISED THE VERSAFITCUP DM LINER HC 58/28 WITH A VERSAFITCUP DM LINER HC 58/28. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 9283658 ↗InjuryMar 21, 2019Fracture
AFTER THE PRIMARY HIP SURGERY WAS COMPLETE, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE FEMUR HAD SUSTAINED AN INTRA-OPERATIVE FRACTURE. THE SURGEON SUSPECTS THE FRACTURE OCCURRED WHEN THE STEM WAS IMPLANTED. THE SURGEON CABLED THE FRACTURE AND REVISED THE STEM FROM A SIZE 6 TO A SIZE 5 AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 8439905 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices
- PINNACLE 1217-25-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED735 reports
- NA 1365-52-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED683 reports
- APEX 1246-03-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED3 deaths613 reports
- PINNACLE 1217-20-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED2 deaths590 reports
- PINNACLE 1217-30-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED1 death484 reports
- NA 1365-53-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED404 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED388 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-32-050Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED386 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page